ArticleInfection prevention in practice2024
Evaluation of brushing efficiency in reducing oral microbiota in mechanically ventilated patients admitted to an intensive care unit.
Article in Infection prevention in practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biofilm Formation on Endotracheal and Tracheostomy Tubing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Culture Data and Sampling Method.MicrobiologyOpen · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Oral Hygiene Interventions and Pneumonia Prevention in Critical Care: An Integrative Review of Evidence and Practice.International journal of dentistry · 2026Review
- Oropharyngeal Interventions in Intubated Patients for Preventing Ventilator Associated Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Multi-Variate Network Meta-Analysis Evaluating Pharmacological Agents.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Effects of Dental Follow-up on Oral Health, Antibiotic Prescriptions, and Hospitalizations in Pediatric Home Care Patients: A Single-Group Quasi-Experimental Study.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
- Effect of oral care protocol with versus without chlorhexidine on mortality of mechanically ventilated patients: Prospective randomized controlled trial.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) are at greater risk of developing nosocomial infections due to their investigations, treatment and changes in the immune system. One of the most prevalent nosocomial infections is respiratory tract infection, such as hospital acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The bacteria commonly found in the oral cavity in the hospital environment are Methodology: The sample consisted of 90 patients (of both sexes), mean age of 65 years, under mechanical ventilation by orotracheal tube and tracheostomized patients, without suspected or confirmed diagnosis of pneumonia. Patients were randomized ∗∗∗. Results: Results showed that oral hygiene using a toothbrush by suction, with chlorhexidine gel 0.12% (Group B), was more effective than conventional hygiene using gauze soaked with chlorhexidine 0.12% (Group A) in reducing pathogenic buccal microbiota. Conclusions: There was a reduction of the pathogenic buccal microbiota in mechanically ventilated patients receiving oral hygiene using a toothbrush by suction with chlorhexidine gel 0.12% (Group B).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.