Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38380343›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2024

A randomized controlled trial protocol for a virtual, scalable suicide prevention gatekeeper training program for community pharmacy staff (Pharm-SAVES).

Jill E Lavigne, Amanda N Stover, Abigail Gamble, Gail Tudor, Wendi F Cross, Delesha M Carpenter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jill E LavigneWegmans School of Pharmacy, St John Fisher University, United States.
Amanda N StoverClemson University, United States.
Abigail GambleEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States.
Gail TudorEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States.
Wendi F CrossUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, United States.
Delesha M CarpenterEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Suicide prevention gatekeeping is a skill that may support community (retail) pharmacists in managing patients who present with suicide warning signs. A brief, virtual, case-based training intervention was tailored to the retail setting (Pharm-SAVES). To test training effectiveness, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) protocol was developed for use in pharmacies across four states. Objective: To introduce the trial protocol for assessing the effectiveness for increasing the proportion of staff who recognize patients displaying warning signs and self-report engaging in gatekeeping, including asking if the patient is considering suicide. Methods: This study uses a parallel cluster-randomized controlled trial to recruit 150 pharmacy staff in community pharmacies in four states with two groups (intervention and control). The control group completes Pharm-SAVES online suicide prevention gatekeeper training and all assessment surveys at baseline after training and at 1-month follow-up. The experimental group completes all control group training and assessments plus interactive video role-play patient cases. Conclusion: We hypothesize that compared to those in the control group, experimental group trainees exposed to the interactive video role play patient cases will be more likely to recognize warning signs in patient cases and self-report engaging in gatekeeping.

Indexed as

Community pharmacyGatekeepingOnline trainingRural populationStudy protocolSuicideSuicide prevention

Identifiers

PMID38380343
PMCPMC10878835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.