ArticleJournal of human kinetics2024
Unique Neural Mechanisms Underlying Speed Control of Low-Force Ballistic Contractions.
Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Upper-Limb Muscle Fatigability in Para-Athletes Quantified as the Rate of Force Development in Rapid Contractions of Submaximal Amplitude.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
According to the speed-control hypothesis, the rate of force development (RFD) during ballistic contractions is dictated by force amplitude because time to peak force (TPF) remains constant regardless of changes in force amplitude. However, this hypothesis has not been tested at force levels below 20% of an individual's maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). Here, we examined the relationship between the RFD and force amplitude from 2 to 85% MVC and the underlying structure of muscle activity in 18 young adults. Participants exerted ballistic index finger abductions for 50 trials in each of seven randomly assigned force levels (2, 5, 15, 30, 50, 70, and 85% MVC). We quantified TPF, RFD, and various EMG burst characteristics. Contrary to the speed-control hypothesis, we found that TPF was not constant, but significantly varied from 2 to 85% MVC. Specifically, the RFD slope from 2 to 15% MVC was greater than the RFD slope from 30 to 85% MVC. Longer TPF at low force levels was associated with the variability of EMG burst duration, whereas longer TPF with higher force levels was associated with the EMG burst integral. Contrary to the speed-control hypothesis, we found that the regulation of TPF for low and high force levels was different, suggesting that neuronal variability is critical for force levels below 30% MVC and neuronal amplitude for force levels above 30% MVC. These findings present compelling new evidence highlighting the limitations of the speed-control hypothesis underscoring the need for a new theoretical framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.