ReviewRSC advances2024
Challenges and progress in oxygen evolution reaction catalyst development for seawater electrolysis for hydrogen production.
Review in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Atomic-Scale Engineering to Industry-Ready Systems: Prospects for Seawater Electrolysis Toward Hydrogen.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Assessing hypochlorite selectivity of corrosion resistance catalysts for alkaline seawater splitting.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Electrochemical Corrosion and Catalysis Dynamics of Tin Oxide during Water Oxidation.ACS catalysis · 2025Article
- Strategic drive toward bi-linker MOFs: an efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Electrodeposition and Optimisation of Amorphous NiChemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024Article
- Tuning the high-entropy perovskite as efficient and reliable electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction.RSC advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Production of green hydrogen on a large scale can negatively impact freshwater resources. Therefore, using seawater as an electrolyte in electrolysis is a desirable alternative to reduce costs and freshwater reliance. However, there are limitations to this approach, primarily due to the catalyst involved in the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). In seawater, the OER features sluggish kinetics and complicated chemical reactions that compete. This review first introduces the benefits and challenges of direct seawater electrolysis and then summarises recent research into cost-effective and durable OER electrocatalysts. Different modification methods for nickel-based electrocatalysts are thoroughly reviewed, and promising electrocatalysts that the authors believe deserve further exploration have been highlighted.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.