Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38380217›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of 0.25% Lotilaner Ophthalmic Solution in the Treatment of Demodex Blepharitis.

Bakhtawar Awan, Mohamed Elsaigh, Areej Tariq, Mohammed Badee, Abhinav Loomba, Yahya Khedr, Ahmed Abdelmaksoud

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Lotilaner Ophthalmic Solution, 0.25%, for the Treatment ofHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Bakhtawar AwanDepartment of General and Emergency Surgery, Northwick Park Hospital, London, GBR.
Mohamed ElsaighDepartment of General and Emergency Surgery, Northwick Park Hospital, London, GBR.
Areej TariqDepartment of Opthalmology, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Mohammed BadeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Perfect Vision Eye Hospital, Cairo, EGY.
Abhinav LoombaDepartment of Opthalmology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, GBR.
Yahya KhedrDepartment of Opthalmology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, GBR.
Ahmed AbdelmaksoudDepartment of Opthalmology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Cottingham, GBR.
Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust · GBShaikh Zayed Hospital · PKVision Eye Institute · AUNorthwick Park Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Demodex blepharitis is marked by an excessive presence of Demodex mites on the eyelids, particularly in the lash follicles. While these microscopic mites are a natural component of the skin microbiota, their overabundance can lead to ocular complications. Symptoms associated with Demodex blepharitis include eyelid itching, inflammation, and ocular irritation. Our objective is to investigate Lotilaner as a potential treatment for Demodex blepharitis, assessing both the safety and efficacy of the ophthalmic formula in managing this disease. We conducted research in Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus up to November 2023. The quality of studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and it was employed to evaluate the quality of evidence. Our meta-analysis was executed using Review Manager 5.4. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of Lotilaner ophthalmic solution with a concentration of 0.25%. The following outcomes were assessed: clinically meaningful reduction in collarette, collarette cure, composite cure, drop comfort, erythema cure, mite density, and mite eradication. In the case of dichotomous data, we used the risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). In our analysis, all included studies, comprising a total of 891 participants, consistently reported clinically meaningful reductions in collarettes. The findings were statistically significant, with Lotilaner demonstrating a substantially higher reduction compared to the vehicle group (RR = 3.09, 95% CI [2.65-3.60];

Indexed as

collarettesdemodex folliculorumdemodex infestationdemodex mitelotilaner ophthalmic solutiontreatment of demodex

Identifiers

PMID38380217
PMCPMC10878406
OpenAlexW4391060573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.