Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38380180›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024

Genetic, clinical and imaging implications of a noncompaction phenotype population with preserved ejection fraction.

Kinga Grebur, Balázs Mester, Bálint András Fekete, Anna Réka Kiss, Zsófia Gregor, Márton Horváth, Kristóf Farkas-Sütő, Katalin Csonka, Csaba Bödör, Béla Merkely and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kinga GreburHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Balázs MesterHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Bálint András FeketeHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Anna Réka KissHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsófia GregorHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Márton HorváthHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Kristóf Farkas-SütőHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Katalin CsonkaDepartment of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Csaba BödörDepartment of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Béla MerkelyHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Hajnalka VágóHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Andrea SzűcsHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The genotype of symptomatic left ventricular noncompaction phenotype (LVNC) subjects with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and its effect on clinical presentation are less well studied. We aimed to characterize the genetic, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and clinical background, and genotype-phenotype relationship in LVNC with preserved LVEF. Methods: We included 54 symptomatic LVNC individuals (LVEF: 65 ± 5%) whose samples were analyzed with a 174-gene next-generation sequencing panel and 54 control (C) subjects. The results were evaluated using the criteria of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Medical data suggesting a higher risk of cardiovascular complications were considered "red flags". Results: Of the LVNC population, 24% carried pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P) mutations; 56% carried variants of uncertain significance (VUS); and 20% were free from cardiomyopathy-related mutations. Regarding the CMR parameters, the LVNC and C groups differed significantly, while the three genetic subgroups were comparable. We found a significant relationship between red flags and genotype; furthermore, the number of red flags in a single subject differed significantly among the genetic subgroups ( Discussion: The large number of P mutations and the association between red flags and genotype underline the importance of genetic-assisted risk stratification in symptomatic LVNC with preserved LVEF.

Indexed as

cardiac magnetic resonance imagingcardiogeneticsexcessive trabeculationhypertrabeculationnoncompactionrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID38380180
PMCPMC10876896
OpenAlexW4391573812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.