Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38380045›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Effect of cultivar mixtures of Finger millet [

Rajesh Manickam, Sudha Appusami, Sharavanan Periyanna Thangavelu, Sivagamy Kannan, Nirmalakumari Angamuthu, A Thanga Hemavathy, Balaji Thiruvaliperumal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rajesh ManickamDepartment of Plant Pathology, Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College and Research Institute, Trichy, 620027, India.
Sudha AppusamiDepartment of Millets, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, India.
Sharavanan Periyanna ThangaveluCentre of Excellence in Millets, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Athiyandal, 606603, India.
Sivagamy KannanKrishi Vigyan Kendra, Tirur, 602 025, India.
Nirmalakumari AngamuthuCentre of Excellence in Millets, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Athiyandal, 606603, India.
A Thanga HemavathyDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College and Research Institute, Trichy, 620 027, India.
Balaji ThiruvaliperumalKrishi Vigyan Kendra, Ramanathapuram, 623 536, India.
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University · INKrishi Vigyan Kendra, Ghatkhed Amravati · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aimed to assess the impact of different combinations of cultivar mixtures on finger millet blast epidemics without affecting yield. The research employed Disease Progress Curves (DPCs) such as AUDPC, rAUDPC, and sAUDPC to evaluate leaf, neck and finger blast epidemics' severity at various time intervals. Treatments involved mixtures of pre-released cultures and commercial varieties, combined with resistant cultivars in ratios of 1:1 and 2:1 to combat blast disease. These mixtures were compared with monoculture performances (resistant and susceptible checks) and fungicide treatments. The mixture of pre-released cultures (TNEc 1285 + TNEc 1294 + TNEc 1310) combined with the resistant cultivar GE4449 at a 1:1 ratio demonstrated the most significant impact in reducing the Area Under Disease Progressive Curve (AUDPC) values for all three blast types while maintaining consistent yield. This treatment exhibited results comparable to fungicide (Tricyclazole 75% WP) sprays across trials conducted from September to December in both 2020 and 2021. Economically, the cost-benefit ratio favoured the culture composite despite its delayed onset and slower progression during disease epidemics under field conditions. The mixture of cultures demonstrated sustainable yield without requiring significant additional input costs or frequent fungicidal application in both trial periods. This suggests a promising and cost-effective approach to managing finger millet blast epidemics while maintaining yield stability in agricultural practices.

Indexed as

AUDPCBlast resistanceCost-benefitCultivar mixtureYield

Identifiers

PMID38380045
PMCPMC10877200
OpenAlexW4391738077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.