Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38380043›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Innovative technologies for removal of micro plastic: A review of recent advances.

Muhammad Salman Nasir, Ifrah Tahir, Ahsan Ali, Iqra Ayub, Abdul Nasir, Naseem Abbas, Uzair Sajjad, Khalid Hamid

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Muhammad Salman NasirDepartment of Structures and Environmental Engineering, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan.
Ifrah TahirDepartment of Structures and Environmental Engineering, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan.
Ahsan AliGuangdong Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Shantou, 515063, China.
Iqra AyubDepartment of Energy Systems Engineering, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan.
Abdul NasirDepartment of Structures and Environmental Engineering, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan.
Naseem AbbasDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul, 05006, South Korea.
Uzair SajjadDepartment of Energy and Refrigerating Air-Conditioning Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, 10608, Taiwan.
Khalid HamidProcess and Power Research Group, Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
University of Agriculture Faisalabad · PKGuangdong Technion-Israel Institute of Technology · CNNational Taipei University of Technology · TWNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOSejong University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plastics are becoming a pervasive pollutant in every environmental matrix, particularly in the aquatic environment. Due to increased plastic usage and its impact on human and aquatic life, microplastic (MP) pollution has been studied extensively as a global issue. The production of MP has been linked to both consumer and commercial practices. There is a significant amount of MP's that must be removed by wastewater treatment plants before they can be bioaccumulated. Many researchers have recently become interested in the possibility of eliminating MPs in wastewater treatment plants (WWTP). Many studies have analyzed MP's environmental effects, including its emission sources, distribution, and impact on the surrounding environment. The effectiveness of their removal by various wastewater treatment technologies requires a critical review that accounts for all these methods. In this review, we have covered the most useful technologies for the removal of MP during WWTP. The findings of this review should help scientists and policymakers move forward with studies, prototypes, and proposals for significant remediation impact on water quality.

Indexed as

MicroplasticPollutionPolymersRemovalWastewater

Identifiers

PMID38380043
PMCPMC10877293
OpenAlexW4391721009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.