ArticleHeliyon2024
Optimized multiple-attribute group decision-making through employing probabilistic hesitant fuzzy TODIM and EDAS technique and application to teaching quality evaluation of international Chinese course in higher vocational colleges.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-10-01Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/141BE88F6C3B33C1C6D7C2A9F65FC2
- Retracted
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the construction and development of the "the Belt and Road", the international community has an increasing demand for high-quality technical and skilled talents who both understand Chinese and have an international perspective. Exploring a Chinese curriculum system suitable for the development of international students is conducive to promoting the international development of vocational education, improving the quality of international student training, providing talent support for Chinese and foreign enterprises, and promoting the "going out" of Chinese enterprises and international production capacity cooperation. The training of international students in higher vocational colleges starts late, has little experience, lacks theoretical innovation, and lacks the development characteristics of vocational education. The teaching quality evaluation of international Chinese course in higher vocational colleges is multiple-attributes group decision-making (MAGDM). Recently, the TODIM and EDAS technique has been employed to manage MAGDM. The probabilistic hesitant fuzzy sets (PHFSs) are employed as a useful tool for depicting uncertain information during the teaching quality evaluation of international Chinese course in higher vocational colleges. In this paper, the probabilistic hesitant fuzzy TODIM-EDAS (PHF-TODIM-EDAS) technique is built to manage the MAGDM under PHFSs. Finally, the numerical example for teaching quality evaluation of international Chinese course in higher vocational colleges is employed to show the PHF-TODIM-EDAS technique. The main contribution of this paper is outlined: (1) the TODIM technique based on EDAS technique has been extended to PHFSs based on CRITIC technique; (2) the CRITIC technique is employed to derive weight numbers under PHFSs. (3) the PHF-TODIM-EDAS technique is founded to manage the MAGDM under PHFSs; (4) a numerical case study for teaching quality evaluation of international Chinese course in higher vocational colleges and some comparative analysis is supplied to validate the proposed PHF-TODIM-EDAS technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.