Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38379888›Full record

ArticleData in brief2024

An indigenous dataset for the detection and classification of apple leaf diseases.

Arshad Ahmad Yatoo, Amit Sharma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arshad Ahmad YatooSchool of Computer Applications, Lovely Professional University, India.
Amit SharmaSchool of Computer Applications, Lovely Professional University, India.
Lovely Professional University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Like other crops, different types of diseases affect apple trees. These diseases cause ugly cosmetic changes on the fruit and hence reduce its shelf life and value. To eliminate their impact, they need to be detected well in advance before any control measures are applied. The manual method of disease detection and subsequent classification has flaws as it involves manual scouting and analysis of the affected leaves through the naked eye. Besides, the manual method may result in wrong judgment as the knowledge of an expert limits the accuracy. Deep Learning Models have been successfully implemented for automated disease detection and classification. However, these models need massive datasets for training, testing and validation. This study proposes one such dataset that has been built indigenously by collecting images from the apple cultivation fields of Kashmir valley and subjecting it to cleaning and subsequent annotation by experts. Augmentation techniques have been used to enhance the size and quality of the dataset to prevent over-fitting of deep learning models.

Indexed as

Apple leaf datasetAutomated disease detectionPhytopathology

Identifiers

PMID38379888
PMCPMC10877676
OpenAlexW4391574885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.