Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38379760›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024

Development of a feline model for preclinical research of a new translabyrinthine auditory nerve implant.

W Mitchel Thomas, Steven A Zuniga, Inderbir Sondh, Moritz Leber, Florian Solzbacher, Thomas Lenarz, Hubert H Lim, David J Warren, Loren Rieth, Meredith E Adams

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pilot Chronic Evaluation of a Slanted Electrode Array as an Auditory Nerve Implant.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

W Mitchel Thomas *Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Steven A Zuniga *Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Inderbir SondhDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Moritz LeberBlackrock Neurotech, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Florian SolzbacherBlackrock Neurotech, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Thomas LenarzDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Hubert H LimDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
David J WarrenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Loren RiethDepartment Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States.
Meredith E AdamsDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
University of Minnesota · USBlackrock Microsystems (United States) · USUniversity of Utah · USMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEWest Virginia University · US

Funding

Supplement to Assess the MRI Safety of an Intracranial Auditory Nerve ImplantUG3NS107688 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ADAMS, MEREDITH EVELYN, FRANKLIN, ROBERT KYLE · 2018 to 2022
$7.0M
Development and Translation of an Intracranial Auditory Nerve ImplantUH3NS107688 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ADAMS, MEREDITH EVELYN, LEBER, MORITZ MICHAEL · 2025 to 2025
$1.5M
NINDS NIH HHS UG3 NS107688NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS107688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear implants are among the most successful neural prosthetic devices to date but exhibit poor frequency selectivity and the inability to consistently activate apical (low frequency) spiral ganglion neurons. These issues can limit hearing performance in many cochlear implant patients, especially for understanding speech in noisy environments and in perceiving or appreciating more complex inputs such as music and multiple talkers. For cochlear implants, electrical current must pass through the bony wall of the cochlea, leading to widespread activation of auditory nerve fibers. Cochlear implants also cannot be implanted in some individuals with an obstruction or severe malformations of the cochlea. Alternatively, intraneural stimulation delivered via an auditory nerve implant could provide direct contact with neural fibers and thus reduce unwanted current spread. More confined current during stimulation can increase selectivity of frequency fiber activation. Furthermore, devices such as the Utah Slanted Electrode Array can provide access to the full cross section of the auditory nerve, including low frequency fibers that are difficult to reach using a cochlear implant. However, further scientific and preclinical research of these Utah Slanted Electrode Array devices is limited by the lack of a chronic large animal model for the auditory nerve implant, especially one that leverages an appropriate surgical approach relevant for human translation. This paper presents a newly developed transbullar translabyrinthine surgical approach for implanting the auditory nerve implant into the cat auditory nerve. In our first of a series of studies, we demonstrate a surgical approach in non-recovery experiments that enables implantation of the auditory nerve implant into the auditory nerve, without damaging the device and enabling effective activation of the auditory nerve fibers, as measured by electrode impedances and electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses. These positive results motivate performing future chronic cat studies to assess the long-term stability and function of these auditory nerve implant devices, as well as development of novel stimulation strategies that can be translated to human patients.

Indexed as

auditory nerve implantauditory prosthesescatfelinenerve stimulationpreclinical modeltranslabyrinthine approachUtah electrode array

Identifiers

PMID38379760
PMCPMC10877721
OpenAlexW4391576368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.