Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38379759›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024

Variational mode decomposition-based EEG analysis for the classification of disorders of consciousness.

Sreelakshmi Raveendran, Raghavendra Kenchaiah, Santhos Kumar, Jayakrushna Sahoo, M K Farsana, Ravindranadh Chowdary Mundlamuri, Sonia Bansal, V S Binu, A G Ramakrishnan, Subasree Ramakrishnan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sreelakshmi RaveendranDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology, Kottayam, Kerala, India.
Raghavendra KenchaiahDepartment of Neurology, NIMHANS, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Santhos KumarDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology, Kottayam, Kerala, India.
Jayakrushna SahooDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology, Kottayam, Kerala, India.
M K FarsanaDepartment of Neurology, NIMHANS, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Ravindranadh Chowdary MundlamuriDepartment of Neurology, NIMHANS, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Sonia BansalDepartment of Neuroanaesthesia and Neurocritical Care, NIMHANS, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
V S BinuDepartment of Biostatistics, NIMHANS, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
A G RamakrishnanDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Subasree RamakrishnanDepartment of Neurology, NIMHANS, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
S KalaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology, Kottayam, Kerala, India.
National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences · INIndian Institute of Information Technology and Management, Kerala · INIndian Institute of Science Bangalore · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aberrant alterations in any of the two dimensions of consciousness, namely awareness and arousal, can lead to the emergence of disorders of consciousness (DOC). The development of DOC may arise from more severe or targeted lesions in the brain, resulting in widespread functional abnormalities. However, when it comes to classifying patients with disorders of consciousness, particularly utilizing resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) signals through machine learning methods, several challenges surface. The non-stationarity and intricacy of EEG data present obstacles in understanding neuronal activities and achieving precise classification. To address these challenges, this study proposes variational mode decomposition (VMD) of EEG before feature extraction along with machine learning models. By decomposing preprocessed EEG signals into specified modes using VMD, features such as sample entropy, spectral entropy, kurtosis, and skewness are extracted across these modes. The study compares the performance of the features extracted from VMD-based approach with the frequency band-based approach and also the approach with features extracted from raw-EEG. The classification process involves binary classification between unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) and the minimally conscious state (MCS), as well as multi-class classification (coma vs. UWS vs. MCS). Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to determine the statistical significance of the features and features with a significance of

Indexed as

disorders of consciousnessensemble bagged treepatient careresource managementresting-state EEGtreatment options and rehabilitation strategiesvariational mode decomposition

Identifiers

PMID38379759
PMCPMC10876804
OpenAlexW4391571306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.