Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38379584›Full record

ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2024

Primary liver cancer classification from routine tumour biopsy using weakly supervised deep learning.

Aurélie Beaufrère, Nora Ouzir, Paul Emile Zafar, Astrid Laurent-Bellue, Miguel Albuquerque, Gwladys Lubuela, Jules Grégory, Catherine Guettier, Kévin Mondet, Jean-Christophe Pesquet and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
15.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Aurélie BeaufrèreAP-HP. Nord, Department of Pathology, FHU MOSAIC, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France.
Nora OuzirUniversity of Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, CVN, OPIS Inria, Gif-sur-Yvette 91190, France.
Paul Emile ZafarAP-HP. Nord, Department of Pathology, FHU MOSAIC, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France.
Astrid Laurent-BellueAP-HP, Department of Pathology, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin- Bicêtre, France; UMR-S 1193, Université Paris-Saclay, Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Miguel AlbuquerqueAP-HP. Nord, Department of Pathology, FHU MOSAIC, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France.
Gwladys LubuelaUniversité Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Jules GrégoryAP-HP. Nord, Department of Pathology, FHU MOSAIC, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France.
Catherine GuettierAP-HP, Department of Pathology, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin- Bicêtre, France; UMR-S 1193, Université Paris-Saclay, Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Kévin MondetAP-HP. Nord, Department of Pathology, FHU MOSAIC, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France.
Jean-Christophe PesquetUniversity of Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, CVN, OPIS Inria, Gif-sur-Yvette 91190, France.
Valérie ParadisAP-HP. Nord, Department of Pathology, FHU MOSAIC, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France.
Université Paris-Saclay · FRHôpital Beaujon · FRInserm · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & Aims: The diagnosis of primary liver cancers (PLCs) can be challenging, especially on biopsies and for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA). We automatically classified PLCs on routine-stained biopsies using a weakly supervised learning method. Method: We selected 166 PLC biopsies divided into training, internal and external validation sets: 90, 29 and 47 samples, respectively. Two liver pathologists reviewed each whole-slide hematein eosin saffron (HES)-stained image (WSI). After annotating the tumour/non-tumour areas, tiles of 256x256 pixels were extracted from the WSIs and used to train a ResNet18 neural network. The tumour/non-tumour annotations served as labels during training, and the network's last convolutional layer was used to extract new tumour tile features. Without knowledge of the precise labels of the malignancies, we then applied an unsupervised clustering algorithm. Results: Pathological review classified the training and validation sets into hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, 33/90, 11/29 and 26/47), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA, 28/90, 9/29 and 15/47), and cHCC-CCA (29/90, 9/29 and 6/47). In the two-cluster model, Clusters 0 and 1 contained mainly HCC and iCCA histological features. The diagnostic agreement between the pathological diagnosis and the two-cluster model predictions (major contingent) in the internal and external validation sets was 100% (11/11) and 96% (25/26) for HCC and 78% (7/9) and 87% (13/15) for iCCA, respectively. For cHCC-CCA, we observed a highly variable proportion of tiles from each cluster (cluster 0: 5-97%; cluster 1: 2-94%). Conclusion: Our method applied to PLC HES biopsy could identify specific morphological features of HCC and iCCA. Although no specific features of cHCC-CCA were recognized, assessing the proportion of HCC and iCCA tiles within a slide could facilitate the identification of cHCC-CCA. Impact and implications: The diagnosis of primary liver cancers can be challenging, especially on biopsies and for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA). We automatically classified primary liver cancers on routine-stained biopsies using a weakly supervised learning method. Our model identified specific features of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Despite no specific features of cHCC-CCA being recognized, the identification of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma tiles within a slide could facilitate the diagnosis of primary liver cancers, and particularly cHCC-CCA.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebiopsyhistological slidesPrimary liver cancerweakly supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID38379584
PMCPMC10877109
OpenAlexW4391066052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.