Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38379562›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Effects of a music therapy and music listening intervention for nursing home residents with dementia: a randomized controlled trial.

Anna-Eva J C Prick, Sytse U Zuidema, Peter van Domburg, Peter Verboon, Annemieke C Vink, Jos M G A Schols, Susan van Hooren

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Music-based therapeutic interventions for people with dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Anna-Eva J C PrickDepartment of Creative Arts Therapies, Zuyd Hogeschool, Heerlen, Netherlands.
Sytse U ZuidemaDepartment of Primary and Long-Term Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Peter van DomburgDepartment of Neurology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, Netherlands.
Peter VerboonDepartment of Methods and Statistics, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, Netherlands.
Annemieke C VinkDepartment of Music Therapy, ArtEZ University of the Arts, Arnhem, Netherlands.
Jos M G A ScholsDepartment of HSR, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Susan van HoorenDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, Netherlands.
Open University of the Netherlands · NLArtEZ Institute of the Arts · NLMaastricht University · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NLZuyd University of Applied Sciences · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of an individual music therapy intervention and an individual music listening intervention on neuropsychiatric symptoms and quality of life in people with dementia living in a nursing home and on professional caregiver's burden to be able to make statements about their specific value of application in clinical practice. Methods: A multicenter single blind randomized controlled trial with three groups was performed: an individual music therapy intervention (IMTI) group ( Results: In total 158 people with dementia were randomized to one of the two intervention groups or the control group. Multilevel analyses demonstrated that hyperactive behaviour assessed by the NPI-NH was significantly more reduced for the IMLI group at follow up and that restless behaviour assessed by the Qualidem was significantly more reduced for the IMTI group at post and follow-up measurement compared to the control group. No significant effects between groups were found in other NPI-NH clusters or Qualidem subscales. Conclusion: In conclusion, because we found no convincing evidence that the IMTI or IMLI is more effective than the other both interventions should be considered in clinical practice. For the future, we advise further research into the sustainability of the effects with alternative designs, like a single case experimental design.

Indexed as

dementiamusic listeningmusic therapyneuropsychiatric symptomsnursing homeproblem behaviourpsychosocial interventionquality of life

Identifiers

PMID38379562
PMCPMC10877716
OpenAlexW4391576126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.