Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38379432›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2024

A rapid and scalable approach to build synthetic repetitive hormone-responsive promoters.

Josefina-Patricia Fernandez-Moreno, Anna E Yaschenko, Matthew Neubauer, Alex J Marchi, Chengsong Zhao, José T Ascencio-Ibanez, Jose M Alonso, Anna N Stepanova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Strengths and Limitations of Salicylic Acid Reporters.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Plant engineering: advances, bottlenecks, and promise.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Josefina-Patricia Fernandez-MorenoDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Anna E YaschenkoDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Matthew NeubauerDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Alex J MarchiDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Chengsong ZhaoDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
José T Ascencio-IbanezDepartment of Molecular and Structural Biochemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Jose M AlonsoDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Anna N StepanovaDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1018-4758

Funding

NC STATE MOLECULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAM (MBTP)T32GM133366 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Jason M. Haugh, Robert M Kelly · 2020 to 2026
$3.3M
National Science Foundation 1444561National Science Foundation 1650139National Science Foundation 1750006National Science Foundation 1940829NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM133366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancement of DNA-synthesis technologies has greatly facilitated the development of synthetic biology tools. However, high-complexity DNA sequences containing tandems of short repeats are still notoriously difficult to produce synthetically, with commercial DNA synthesis companies usually rejecting orders that exceed specific sequence complexity thresholds. To overcome this limitation, we developed a simple, single-tube reaction method that enables the generation of DNA sequences containing multiple repetitive elements. Our strategy involves commercial synthesis and PCR amplification of padded sequences that contain the repeats of interest, along with random intervening sequence stuffers that include type IIS restriction enzyme sites. GoldenBraid molecular cloning technology is then employed to remove the stuffers, rejoin the repeats together in a predefined order, and subclone the tandem(s) in a vector using a single-tube digestion-ligation reaction. In our hands, this new approach is much simpler, more versatile and efficient than previously developed solutions to this problem. As a proof of concept, two different phytohormone-responsive, synthetic, repetitive proximal promoters were generated and tested in planta in the context of transcriptional reporters. Analysis of transgenic lines carrying the synthetic ethylene-responsive promoter 10x2EBS-S10 fused to the GUS reporter gene uncovered several developmentally regulated ethylene response maxima, indicating the utility of this reporter for monitoring the involvement of ethylene in a variety of physiologically relevant processes. These encouraging results suggest that this reporter system can be leveraged to investigate the ethylene response to biotic and abiotic factors with high spatial and temporal resolution.

Indexed as

Plant Growth RegulatorsPromoter Regions, GeneticCloning, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlants, Genetically ModifiedSynthetic BiologyPlant Growth Regulatorscis‐elementethylene reporterGoldenBraidhormone‐responsive promoterrepetitive DNA sequencesequence stuffer

Identifiers

PMID38379432
PMCPMC11182585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.