Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38379333›Full record

ReviewCancer medicine2024

Molecular complexity of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate.

Sha Zhu, Nanwei Xu, Hao Zeng

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sha ZhuDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1152-2536
Nanwei XuDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hao ZengDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0818-8151
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

Bethune Foundation, Oncology Basic Research Program X-J-2020-016Bethune Foundation, Urological Oncology Special Research Fund mnzl202002Bethune Foundation, Urological Oncology Special Research Fund mnzl202007Clinical and Translational Medicine Research Project, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences 2022-I2M-C&T-B-098National Natural Science Foundation of China 81974398National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172785National Natural Science Foundation of China NSFC 82203110Science and Technology Support Program of Sichuan Province 2021YFS0119West China Hospital, Sichuan University ZYGD22004West China Hospital, Sichuan University ZYJC21020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) is an aggressive subtype of prostate cancer characterized by the growth of tumor cells within the prostate ducts. It is often found alongside invasive carcinoma and is associated with poor prognosis. Understanding the molecular mechanisms driving IDC-P is crucial for improved diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment strategies. This review summarizes the molecular characteristics of IDC-P and their prognostic indications, comparing them to conventional prostate acinar adenocarcinoma, to gain insights into its unique behavior and identify potential therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMalePrognosisProstateDNA damage and repairIntraductal carcinoma of the prostateMED12molecular characteristicsMYCNCOR2prostate acinar adenocarcinomaPTENRB1SChLAP1targeted therapyTMPRSS2-ERG fusionTP53

Identifiers

PMID38379333
PMCPMC10879723
OpenAlexW4392006601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.