ArticleCancer medicine2024
Comparison of percutaneous ablation and hepatectomy for liver metastasis: A single center retrospective study.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative outcomes of combined thermal ablation and liver resection versus liver resection alone for multiple colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in predicting recurrence after first-line treatment of liver cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2024Pooled it
- Thermal Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Current Evidence and Future Horizons.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparison of percutaneous ablation and hepatectomy for liver metastasis: A single center retrospective study.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate the current treatment for liver metastasis and clarify the indications for percutaneous thermal ablation for liver metastasis.
methodsNinety-two patients were enrolled and retrospectively analyzed. The patients underwent hepatectomy and/or percutaneous thermal ablation for liver metastases between January 2012 and December 2018. Twenty-six patients who underwent ablation treatment and seven patients who underwent both ablation and hepatectomy were included in the ablation treatment group (group A). We compared these patients with 59 patients who underwent hepatectomy only (group H). Subgroup analyses were performed between ablation (group AC) for colorectal liver metastasis and hepatectomy (group HC) for colorectal liver metastasis in 17 and 53 patients, respectively.
resultsThe percentage of liver metastases other than colorectal cancer in group A was higher than that in the group H. Maximum tumor size in group A was significantly smaller than that in group H. Similarly, the patients in group AC were significantly older and demonstrated higher total bilirubin, lower serum albumin, and lower platelet counts than those in group HC. Overall survival was poorer in the AC group than that in the HC group. However, no differences were observed at metastasis ≤2 cm in size.
conclusionsPercutaneous thermal ablation was performed for many cancer types than hepatectomy. It is performed in elderly patients. We suggested that ablation for colorectal liver metastasis sized ≤2 cm is a suitable indication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.