ArticleThe Kobe journal of medical sciences2024
Expression of EGFR and p16 in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of External Auditory Canal.
Article in The Kobe journal of medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The expression of EGFR and p16 in the external auditory canal squamous cell carcinoma (EACSCC) and their impacts on oncological outcomes were not well studied. Seventeen-one consecutive patients who were treated for EACSCC at Kobe University Hospital from 1995 to 2018 were enrolled in this study. The expression of EGFR, and p16 were evaluated and their impacts on oncological outcomes were statistically analyzed. Positive expression of EGFR was observed in 62 patients (87%). Strong positive expression of p16 were observed in 18 patients (32.4%), and weakly positive expression in 30 patients (42.3%), respectively. While the number of the patients with negative EGFR expression were limited, all the surgically treated patients with negative EGFR expression have been alive without disease. In the patients with T3 & T4a EACSCC, prognosis of the patients with positive p16 expression EACSCC tended to be better than those with negative p16 expression. These results suggest the clinical significance of EGFR and p16 expressions in the patients with advanced EACSCC to predict oncological outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.