ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2024
Proceedings of the Clinical Microbiology Open 2022-assessing clinical laboratory and industry responses to COVID-19 pandemic testing capacity challenges (part 1).
Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-omics analysis of arginine metabolism in ovarian cancer: A prognostic signature and GTF2F2-driven stromal remodeling.Translational oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the COVID-19 pandemic winds down, clinical and public health laboratories, along with industry partners, reflect on the successes and failures of the pandemic response. To capture the lessons learned and better prepare for the next pandemic, the Clinical Microbiology Open (CMO) assembled key stakeholders including directors of clinical laboratories, industry partners, and state and federal agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration. Participants were asked to provide their perspectives on the initial pandemic response, supply chain constraints especially during surges, staffing challenges, test triage and communication strategies, clinical informatics needs, laboratory financial impacts of SARS-CoV-2 testing, and the emergency use authorization process. This manuscript summarizes the diagnostic laboratory and industry perspectives on these issues that were presented and discussed at CMO and proposes some steps that could be taken to improve future pandemic responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.