Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38379110›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2024

Sharing and Receiving Eye-Contact Predicts Mate Choice After a 5-Minute Conversation: Evidence from a Speed-Dating Study.

Alexandra Hoffmann, Sabrina Schiestl, Philipp Sinske, Matthias Gondan, Pierre Sachse, Thomas Maran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexandra HoffmannDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Universität Innsbruck, Universitätsstraße 5-7, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. alexandra.hoffmann@uibk.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0003-2919-2766
Sabrina SchiestlDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Universität Innsbruck, Universitätsstraße 5-7, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Philipp SinskeDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Universität Innsbruck, Universitätsstraße 5-7, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Matthias GondanDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Universität Innsbruck, Universitätsstraße 5-7, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Pierre SachseDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Universität Innsbruck, Universitätsstraße 5-7, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Thomas MaranEntrepreneurship, Innovation and Management, Free University of Bozen, Bozen, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In popular narratives, the first date with a potential mate often centers on their gaze as embodiment of interest and attraction. However, evidence is still lacking on the role of eye-contact as a potent signal in human social interaction in the context of dating. In addition, behavioral mechanisms of mate selection are not well understood. In the present study, we therefore examined mutual eye-contact and its influence on mate choice by applying dual mobile eye-tracking during naturalistic speed-dates. A total of 30 male and 30 female subjects attended four speed-dates each (N = 240). Subjects were more likely to choose those dating partners with whom they shared more eye-contact with. In addition, perceived attractiveness played an important role for mate choice. Interestingly, receiving but not giving eye-contact also predicted individual mate choice. Eye-contact thus acts as an important signal of romantic attraction when encountering a dating partner.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsNarrationChoice BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleDual mobile eye-trackingFace-to-face interactionHuman mate selectionMutual eye-contactSpeed-dating

Identifiers

PMID38379110
PMCPMC10920202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.