ReviewEuropean radiology2024
ESR Essentials: ten steps to cardiac MR-practice recommendations by ESCR.
Review in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reliability of Gemini 2.5 Pro, ChatGPT 4.1, DeepSeek V3, and Claude Opus 4 in generating standardized CMR protocols.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular MR imaging has become an indispensable noninvasive tool in diagnosing and monitoring a broad range of cardiovascular diseases. Key to its clinical success and efficiency are appropriate clinical indication triage, technical expertise, patient safety, standardized preparation and execution, quality assurance, efficient post-processing, structured reporting, and communication and clinical integration of findings. Technological advancements are driving faster, more accessible, and cost-effective approaches. This ESR Essentials article presents a ten-step guide for implementing a cardiovascular MR program, covering indication assessments, optimized imaging, post-processing, and detailed reporting. Future goals include streamlined protocols, improved tissue characterization, and automation for greater standardization and efficiency. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The growing clinical role of cardiovascular MR in risk assessment, diagnosis, and treatment planning highlights the necessity for radiologists to achieve expertise in this modality, advancing precision medicine and healthcare efficiency. KEY POINTS: • Cardiovascular MR is essential in diagnosing and monitoring many acute and chronic cardiovascular pathologies. • Features such as technical expertise, quality assurance, patient safety, and optimized tailored imaging protocols, among others, are essential for a successful cardiovascular MR program. • Ongoing technological advances will push rapid multi-parametric cardiovascular MR, thus improving accessibility, patient comfort, and cost-effectiveness. KEY POINTS: • Cardiovascular MR is essential in diagnosing and monitoring a wide array of cardiovascular pathologies (Level of Evidence: High). • A successful cardiovascular MR program depends on standardization (Level of Evidence: Low). • Future developments will increase the efficiency and accessibility of cardiovascular MR (Level of Evidence: Low).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.