ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024
Predicting Mismatch Repair Deficiency Status in Endometrial Cancer through Multi-Resolution Ensemble Learning in Digital Pathology.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Pathology for Molecular Classification of Endometrial Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence as a pragmatic adjunct to molecular classification in endometrial cancer.Ewha medical journal · 2026Article
- Integrating artificial intelligence and multi-omics data for precision oncology in endometrial cancer: a narrative review.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- AI-based neoadjuvant immunotherapy response prediction across pan-cancer: a comprehensive review.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Tools for Supporting Histopathologic and Molecular Characterization of Gynecological Cancers: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Synergistic H&E and IHC image analysis by AI predicts cancer biomarkers and survival outcomes in colorectal and breast cancer.Communications medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma, testing for mismatch repair (MMR) status is becoming a routine process. Mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D) is caused by loss of expression in one or more of the 4 major MMR proteins: MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PHS2. Over 30% of patients with endometrial cancer have MMR-D. Determining the MMR status holds significance as individuals with MMR-D are potential candidates for immunotherapy. Pathological whole slide image (WSI) of endometrial cancer with immunohistochemistry results of MMR proteins were gathered. Color normalization was applied to the tiles using a CycleGAN-based network. The WSI was divided into tiles at three different magnifications (2.5 × , 5 × , and 10 ×). Three distinct networks of the same architecture were employed to include features from all three magnification levels and were stacked for ensemble learning. Three architectures, InceptionResNetV2, EfficientNetB2, and EfficientNetB3 were employed and subjected to comparison. The per-tile results were gathered to classify MMR status in the WSI, and prediction accuracy was evaluated using the following performance metrics: AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The EfficientNetB2 was able to make predictions with an AUC of 0.821, highest among the three architectures, and an overall AUC range of 0.767 - 0.821 was reported across the three architectures. In summary, our study successfully predicted MMR classification from pathological WSIs in endometrial cancer through a multi-resolution ensemble learning approach, which holds the potential to facilitate swift decisions on tailored treatment, such as immunotherapy, in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.