Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38378855›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2024

Botulinum toxin-A effects on pain, somatosensory and psychosocial features of patients with refractory masticatory myofascial pain: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.

Giancarlo De la Torre Canales, Rodrigo Lorenzi Poluha, Leonardo Rigoldi Bonjardim, Malin Ernberg, Paulo César Rodrigues Conti

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Giancarlo De la Torre CanalesDivision of Oral Rehabilitation, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, and The Scandinavian Center for Orofacial Neurosciences (SCON), Huddinge, Sweden. giancarlo.de.la.torre.canales@ki.se.
Rodrigo Lorenzi PoluhaDepartment of Dentistry, State University of Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
Leonardo Rigoldi BonjardimBauru Orofacial Pain Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Malin ErnbergDivision of Oral Rehabilitation, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, and The Scandinavian Center for Orofacial Neurosciences (SCON), Huddinge, Sweden.
Paulo César Rodrigues ContiBauru Orofacial Pain Group, Department of Prosthodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Karolinska Institutet · SEUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual de Maringá · BR

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/21674-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The antinociceptive effect of BoNT-A have been well documented in animal studies; however, results of few but well-designed randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials about BoNT-A efficacy in masticatory myofascial pain (MFP) are inconsistent. Therefore, the present randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of BoNT-A in patients with refractory MFP. Twenty-eight patients with pain reduction of less than 30% despite conservative treatment and with an average pain intensity of > 50 mm on the visual analogue scale (VAS) participated. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a total of 80 U of BoNT-A or saline solution (SS) injected into the masseter and anterior temporalis muscles. Pain intensity (VAS), quantitative sensory testing (QST), conditioned pain modulation (CPM), and psychosocial status were examined. Follow-up was performed at 1 and 6 months. For repeated-measure comparisons between evaluation times, Friedman test with Bonferroni correction was used for pain and somatosensory variables and the Wilcoxon test for the psychosocial variables. The Mann-Whitney test was used for all comparisons between groups. The BoNT-A group had a significant decrease in pain intensity at follow-ups compared with the SS group (p < 0.001). QST assessment revealed higher pressure pain threshold values in the masseter muscle for BoNT-A group compared to SS (p < 0.03) at all follow-ups. No differences were found for mechanical pain threshold and wind-up ratio values (p > 0.05) in the entire study. The BoNT-A group presented the most efficient CPM effect (p < 0.03) only at the 1 month follow-up in the masseter muscle. There was a significant time effect for BoNT-A in all psychosocial variables (p < 0.05) and a drug effect in the Central Sensitization Inventory (p < 0.01), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (p < 0.004), and Healthy Survey 36 (p < 0.05) at 6 months follow-up. The study demonstrates that a single injection-session of BoNT-A has positive effects on the hall pain spectrum of patients with refractory masticatory myofascial pain.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type AMyofascial Pain SyndromesDouble-Blind MethodHumansInjectionsPainPain ThresholdTreatment OutcomeBotulinum Toxins, Type ABotulinum toxin type AMyofascial painTemporomandibular disorders

Identifiers

PMID38378855
PMCPMC10879180
OpenAlexW4391970894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.