ArticleScientific reports2024
Pediatric diabetes prediction using deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based model for predicting delirium risk in postoperative brain tumor patients in the Intensive Care Unit.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Pediatric diabetes prediction using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- SMENN-hybrid: an efficient technique combining the synthetic minority oversampling technique with ensemble learning for diabetes prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Pediatrics 4.0: the Transformative Impacts of the Latest Industrial Revolution on Pediatrics.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2025Article
- Unveiling the potential of artificial intelligence in revolutionizing disease diagnosis and prediction: a comprehensive review of machine learning and deep learning approaches.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Analyzing classification and feature selection strategies for diabetes prediction across diverse diabetes datasets.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study proposed a novel technique for early diabetes prediction with high accuracy. Recently, Deep Learning (DL) has been proven to be expeditious in the diagnosis of diabetes. The supported model is constructed by implementing ten hidden layers and a multitude of epochs using the Deep Neural Network (DNN)-based multi-layer perceptron (MLP) algorithm. We proceeded to meticulously fine-tune the hyperparameters within the fully automated DL architecture to optimize data preprocessing, prediction, and classification using a novel dataset of Mansoura University Children's Hospital Diabetes (MUCHD), which allowed for a comprehensive evaluation of the system's performance. The system was validated and tested using a sample of 548 patients, each with 18 significant features. Various validation metrics were employed to ensure the reliability of the results using cross-validation approaches with various statistical measures of accuracy, F-score, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and Dice similarity coefficient. The high performance of the proposed system can help clinicians accurately diagnose diabetes, with a remarkable accuracy rate of 99.8%. According to our analysis, implementing this method results in a noteworthy increase of 0.39% in the overall system performance compared to the current state-of-the-art methods. Therefore, we recommend using this method to predict diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.