Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38378734›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Controlled release herbicide formulation for effective weed control efficacy.

Santosh Kumar Paul, Yunfei Xi, Peter Sanderson, Ravi Naidu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Santosh Kumar PaulGlobal Centre for Environmental Remediation (GCER), The University of Newcastle, ATC Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Yunfei XiCentral Analytical Research Facility (CARF) & School of Chemistry and Physics - Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia.
Peter SandersonGlobal Centre for Environmental Remediation (GCER), The University of Newcastle, ATC Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Ravi NaiduGlobal Centre for Environmental Remediation (GCER), The University of Newcastle, ATC Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. Ravi.Naidu@newcastle.edu.au.
University of Newcastle Australia · AUBangladesh Agricultural Research Institute · BDQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controlled release formulation (CRF) of herbicide is an effective weed management technique with less eco-toxicity than other available commercial formulations. To maximise the effectiveness of CRFs however, it is crucial to understand the herbicide-releasing behaviour at play, which predominately depends on the interaction mechanisms between active ingredients and carrier materials during adsorption. In this study, we investigated and modelled the adsorption characteristics of model herbicide 2,4-D onto two organo-montmorillonites (octadecylamine- and aminopropyltriethoxysilane-modified) to synthesise polymer-based CRFs. Herbicide-releasing behaviour of the synthesised CRF microbeads was then analysed under various experimental conditions, and weed control efficacy determined under glasshouse conditions. Results revealed that adsorption of 2,4-D onto both organo-montmorillonites follows the pseudo-second-order kinetics model and is predominately controlled by the chemisorption process. However, multi-step mechanisms were detected in the adsorption on both organoclays, hence intra-particle diffusion is not the sole rate-limiting step for the adsorption process. Both organoclays followed the Elovich model, suggesting they have energetically heterogeneous surfaces. Herbicide-releasing behaviours of synthesised beads were investigated at various pH temperatures and ionic strengths under laboratory and glasshouse conditions. Furthermore, weed control efficacy of synthesised beads were investigated using pot studies under glasshouse condition. Desorption studies revealed that both synthesised microbeads have slow releasing behaviour at a wide range of pHs (5-9), temperatures (25-45 °C), and ionic strengths. The results also revealed that synthesised microbeads have excellent weed control efficacy on different broad-leaf weed species under glasshouse conditions.

Indexed as

Herbicides2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic AcidBentoniteDelayed-Action PreparationsHerbicide ResistancePlant WeedsWeed Control2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic AcidBentoniteDelayed-Action PreparationsHerbicidesCRFsHerbicideKineticsThermodynamicsWeeds

Identifiers

PMID38378734
PMCPMC10879510
OpenAlexW4391964524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.