Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38378690›Full record

ArticleGut pathogens2024

16S rRNA sequencing analysis of the oral and fecal microbiota in colorectal cancer positives versus colorectal cancer negatives in Iranian population.

Sama Rezasoltani, Mehdi Azizmohammad Looha, Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei, Seyedesomayeh Jasemi, Leonardo Antonio Sechi, Maria Gazouli, Amir Sadeghi, Shirin Torkashvand, Reyhaneh Baniali, Hartmut Schlüter and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut pathogens, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Gut Microbiota and Colorectal Cancer: A Balance Between Risk and Protection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sama RezasoltaniSection Mass Spectrometric Proteomics, Diagnostic Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Mehdi Azizmohammad LoohaBasic and Molecular Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Disorders Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 19835-178, Iran.
Hamid Asadzadeh AghdaeiBasic and Molecular Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Disorders Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 19835-178, Iran.
Seyedesomayeh JasemiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale San Pietro 43b, 07100, Sassari, Italy.
Leonardo Antonio SechiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale San Pietro 43b, 07100, Sassari, Italy. sechila@uniss.it.
Maria GazouliDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Laboratory of Biology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Amir SadeghiGastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 19835-178, Iran.
Shirin TorkashvandBasic and Molecular Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Disorders Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 19835-178, Iran.
Reyhaneh BanialiBasic and Molecular Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Disorders Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 19835-178, Iran.
Hartmut SchlüterSection Mass Spectrometric Proteomics, Diagnostic Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Mohammad Reza ZaliGastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 19835-178, Iran.
Mohammad Mehdi FeizabadiDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 19835-178, Iran. mfeizabadi@tums.ac.ir.

Funding

Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran RIGLD1065UNISS FAR fondi ricercar 2021, 2022 and Fondazione di Sardegna 2017 Regione Autonoma della Sardegna, legge regionale 12 dicembre 2022, n. 22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant healthcare challenge, accounting for nearly 6.1% of global cancer cases. Early detection, facilitated by population screening utilizing innovative biomarkers, is pivotal for mitigating CRC incidence. This study aims to scrutinize the fecal and salivary microbiomes of CRC-positive individuals (CPs) in comparison to CRC-negative counterparts (CNs) to enhance early CRC diagnosis through microbial biomarkers. MATERIAL AND

methodsA total of 80 oral and stool samples were collected from Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, encompassing both CPs and CNs undergoing screening. Microbial profiling was conducted using 16S rRNA sequencing assays, employing the Nextera XT Index Kit on an Illumina NovaSeq platform.

resultsDistinct microbial profiles were observed in saliva and stool samples of CPs, diverging significantly from those of CNs at various taxonomic levels, including phylum, family, and species. Saliva samples from CPs exhibited abundance of Calothrix parietina, Granulicatella adiacens, Rothia dentocariosa, and Rothia mucilaginosa, absent in CNs. Additionally, Lachnospiraceae and Prevotellaceae were markedly higher in CPs' feces, while the Fusobacteria phylum was significantly elevated in CPs' saliva. Conversely, the non-pathogenic bacterium Akkermansia muciniphila exhibited a significant decrease in CPs' fecal samples compared to CNs.

conclusionThrough meticulous selection of saliva and stool microbes based on Mean Decrease GINI values and employing logistic regression for saliva and support vector machine models for stool, we successfully developed a microbiota test with heightened sensitivity and specificity for early CRC detection.

Indexed as

16S rRNA sequencingColorectal cancerEarly detectionFecal microbiotaOral microbiota

Identifiers

PMID38378690
PMCPMC10880352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.