Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38378596›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2024

Intelligent systems for sitting posture monitoring and anomaly detection: an overview.

Patrick Vermander, Aitziber Mancisidor, Itziar Cabanes, Nerea Perez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrick VermanderDepartment of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, Bilbao School of Engineering, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Plaza Ingeniero Torres Quevedo, 48013, Bilbao, Spain. patrick.vermander@ehu.eus.
Aitziber Mancisidor *Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, Bilbao School of Engineering, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Plaza Ingeniero Torres Quevedo, 48013, Bilbao, Spain.
Itziar Cabanes *Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, Bilbao School of Engineering, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Plaza Ingeniero Torres Quevedo, 48013, Bilbao, Spain.
Nerea Perez *Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, Bilbao School of Engineering, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Plaza Ingeniero Torres Quevedo, 48013, Bilbao, Spain.

Funding

Eusko Jaurlaritza IT1726-22Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades Project PID2020-112667RB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of people who need to use wheelchair for proper mobility is increasing. The integration of technology into these devices enables the simultaneous and objective assessment of posture, while also facilitating the concurrent monitoring of the functional status of wheelchair users. In this way, both the health personnel and the user can be provided with relevant information for the recovery process. This information can be used to carry out an early adaptation of the rehabilitation of patients, thus allowing to prevent further musculoskeletal problems, as well as risk situations such as ulcers or falls. Thus, a higher quality of life is promoted in affected individuals. As a result, this paper presents an orderly and organized analysis of the existing postural diagnosis systems for detecting sitting anomalies in the literature. This analysis can be divided into two parts that compose such postural diagnosis: on the one hand, the monitoring devices necessary for the collection of postural data and, on the other hand, the techniques used for anomaly detection. These anomaly detection techniques will be explained under two different approaches: the traditional generalized approach followed to date by most works, where anomalies are treated as incorrect postures, and a new individualized approach treating anomalies as changes with respect to the normal sitting pattern. In this way, the advantages, limitations and opportunities of the different techniques are analyzed. The main contribution of this overview paper is to synthesize and organize information, identify trends, and provide a comprehensive understanding of sitting posture diagnosis systems, offering researchers an accessible resource for navigating the current state of knowledge of this particular field.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeWheelchairsHealth PersonnelHumansPostureSitting PositionAnomaly detectionAssistive technologyMachine learningMonitoring and diagnosisOverviewSitting postureWheelchair

Identifiers

PMID38378596
PMCPMC10880321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.