ReviewJournal of translational medicine2024
Clinical data mining: challenges, opportunities, and recommendations for translational applications.
Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Preliminary Validation of a Risk Assessment Tool for Subdural Hematoma in Patients with Intracranial Hypotension.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Translational bioinformatics stalls at implementation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Early Prediction of Adverse Stroke Outcomes Using Nonclinical Factors and Missing Data: A Machine Learning Study.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- TheraMind: a multi-LLM ensemble for accelerating drug repurposing in lung cancer via case report mining.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Reddit and rare diseases: what myositis communities tell us about support and struggle.Oxford open digital health · 2026Article
- A data navigation model to improve access to research data resources in clinical and translational science.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Editorial: Machine learning and AI-driven insights into microbial pathogenesis and drug resistance.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Age- and sex-stratified prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea and stroke risk comorbidities: A large cross-sectional EHR study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Harmonizing self-reported and free text medication data: a reproducible pipeline for gerontological research.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- A Six-Step Protocol for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends Using WHONET and R: Real-World Application and R Code Integration.Methods and protocols · 2025Article
- The data-intensive research paradigm: challenges and responses in clinical professional graduate education.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- An improved Red-billed blue magpie feature selection algorithm for medical data processing.PloS one · 2025Article
- Gene-level connections between anxiety disorders, ADHD, and head and neck cancer: insights from a computational biology approach.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- A Machine Learning Classification Model for Gastrointestinal Health in Cancer Survivors: Roles of Telomere Length and Social Determinants of Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical data mining of predictive models offers significant advantages for re-evaluating and leveraging large amounts of complex clinical real-world data and experimental comparison data for tasks such as risk stratification, diagnosis, classification, and survival prediction. However, its translational application is still limited. One challenge is that the proposed clinical requirements and data mining are not synchronized. Additionally, the exotic predictions of data mining are difficult to apply directly in local medical institutions. Hence, it is necessary to incisively review the translational application of clinical data mining, providing an analytical workflow for developing and validating prediction models to ensure the scientific validity of analytic workflows in response to clinical questions. This review systematically revisits the purpose, process, and principles of clinical data mining and discusses the key causes contributing to the detachment from practice and the misuse of model verification in developing predictive models for research. Based on this, we propose a niche-targeting framework of four principles: Clinical Contextual, Subgroup-Oriented, Confounder- and False Positive-Controlled (CSCF), to provide guidance for clinical data mining prior to the model's development in clinical settings. Eventually, it is hoped that this review can help guide future research and develop personalized predictive models to achieve the goal of discovering subgroups with varied remedial benefits or risks and ensuring that precision medicine can deliver its full potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.