Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38378467›Full record

ReviewTranscription

An emerging paradigm in epigenetic marking: coordination of transcription and replication.

Tyler K Fenstermaker, Svetlana Petruk, Alexander Mazo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transcription. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tyler K FenstermakerDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9627-3390
Svetlana PetrukDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alexander MazoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-7605-6103

Funding

TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION BY EPIGENETIC FACTORSR01GM075141 · NIGMS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI MAZO, ALEXANDER M · 2005 to 2021
$4.9M
Recruitment of transcriptional machinery following DNA replicationF31GM128300 · NIGMS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI FENSTERMAKER, TYLER KENNEDY · 2018 to 2021
$102k
NIGMS NIH HHS F31 GM128300NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM075141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA replication and RNA transcription both utilize DNA as a template and therefore need to coordinate their activities. The predominant theory in the field is that in order for the replication fork to proceed, transcription machinery has to be evicted from DNA until replication is complete. If that does not occur, these machineries collide, and these collisions elicit various repair mechanisms which require displacement of one of the enzymes, often RNA polymerase, in order for replication to proceed. This model is also at the heart of the epigenetic bookmarking theory, which implies that displacement of RNA polymerase during replication requires gradual re-building of chromatin structure, which guides recruitment of transcriptional proteins and resumption of transcription. We discuss these theories but also bring to light newer data that suggest that these two processes may not be as detrimental to one another as previously thought. This includes findings suggesting that these processes can occur without fork collapse and that RNA polymerase may only be transiently displaced during DNA replication. We discuss potential mechanisms by which RNA polymerase may be retained at the replication fork and quickly rebind to DNA post-replication. These discoveries are important, not only as new evidence as to how these two processes are able to occur harmoniously but also because they have implications on how transcriptional programs are maintained through DNA replication. To this end, we also discuss the coordination of replication and transcription in light of revising the current epigenetic bookmarking theory of how the active gene status can be transmitted through S phase.

Indexed as

DNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesDNA ReplicationEpigenesis, GeneticTranscription, GeneticAnimalsChromatinDNAEukaryotaChromatinDNADNA-Directed RNA Polymerasesepigenetic bookmarkingnascent chromatinRNA polymerase IItranscription memorytranscription post-replicationtranscription-replication conflicts

Identifiers

PMID38378467
PMCPMC11093037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.