ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2024
[Decentralized Health Promotion in Nuremberg according to the Prevention Bill: Assessment of results and experiences of the project "Health for Everyone in the District"].
Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Status, classification, and potential of implementation research: an inventory for public health in Germany].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe project "Health for Everyone in the District" was implemented in Nuremberg from May 2017 to October 2022 as part of the law passed to strengthen health promotion and disease prevention with funding from Public Health Insurance, Bavaria. The aim was to implement health promotion measures through a decentralized system in four deprived parts of the city and thus promote health equity on site. Among other aspects, program loyalty, project scope, and acceptance, as well as continuity and establishment of permanent structures underwent external assessment.
methodAs part of the evaluation, quantitative data from the paper-and-pencil feedback forms of the measures (n=580), four qualitative focus group interviews with participants of the project (n=20), and an in-depth partially standardized predominantly quantitative online survey of participants and course instructors from the districts (n=67) were conducted.
resultsThe programs were accepted by those most in need, namely women, elderly people and those with a migration background. Women, senior citizens and people with a migration background were well reached by the measures. The very high level of satisfaction with the measures showed that there were opportunities for implementation of health promotion measures into daily life taking into consideration the local environment and deprived target groups. The specifications of the guidelines for prevention, however, represented a hurdle for the long-term establishment of the measures in these districts.
conclusionThe project "Health for Everyone in the District " represents a local low-threshold approach to social situation-related health promotion in the municipal setting and is suitable for reaching deprived target groups with health-promoting measures. Adjustments to the guidelines for prevention could help create permanent structures on a broader scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.