Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38378003›Full record

ArticleCell reports. Medicine2024

Microbial and metabolic profiles unveil mutualistic microbe-microbe interaction in obesity-related colorectal cancer.

Jinming Li, Ziying Chen, Qinying Wang, Lutao Du, Yongzhi Yang, Fanying Guo, Xinxiang Li, Yanjie Chao, Yanlei Ma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports. Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Lipid metabolism in homeostasis and disease.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Gut Microbial Metabolism in Colorectal Cancer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jinming LiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ziying ChenDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qinying WangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lutao DuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Yongzhi YangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fanying GuoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xinxiang LiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yanjie ChaoCAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Virology and Immunology, Center for Microbes, Development and Health (CMDH), Shanghai Institute of Immunity and Infection, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Yanlei MaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: yanleima@fudan.edu.cn.
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNSecond Hospital of Shandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity is a risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC), and the involvement of gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of obesity and CRC is widely recognized. However, the landscape of fecal microbiome and metabolome distinguishing patients with obesity-related CRC from obesity remains unknown. Here, we utilize metagenomic sequencing and metabolomics from 522 patients with CRC and healthy controls to identify the characteristics of obese CRC. Our integrated analysis reveals that obesity-related CRC is characterized by elevated Peptostreptococcus stomatis, dysregulated fatty acids and phospholipids, and altered Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways involving glycerophospholipid metabolism and lipopolysaccharide synthesis. Correlation analysis unveils microbial interactions in obesity, where the probiotic Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and the tumor-promoting species P. stomatis may engage in cross-feeding, thereby promoting tumorigenesis. In vitro experiments affirm enhanced growth under cross-feeding conditions. The mutualistic microbe-microbe interaction may contribute to the association between obesity and elevated CRC risk. Additionally, diagnostic models incorporating BMI-specific microbial biomarkers display promise for precise CRC screening.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsMicrobiotaHumansMetabolomeMicrobial InteractionsObesitycolorectal cancercross-feedinggut microbiotalipid metabolismmetabolomemetagenomeobesityshort-chain fatty acid

Identifiers

PMID38378003
PMCPMC10982962
OpenAlexW4391934183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.