ReviewDNA repair2024
A-T neurodegeneration and DNA damage-induced transcriptional stress.
Review in DNA repair, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- C9orf72-related amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-frontotemporal dementia and links to the DNA damage response: a systematic review.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- Ataxia-Telangiectasia, DNA Repair Deficits, Immune Dysfunction, and Cancer: A Review of Mechanisms, Clinical Presentations, and Emerging Therapies.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Therapy for the Neurodegenerative Disorder Ataxia-Telangiectasia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- GCN5 and TADA2B constitutively regulate XRCC1 function during DNA repair to maintain cell survival.Cell death and differentiation · 2026Article
- Transcriptional Profiling Shows Dampening of Interferon Gene Signatures by NADInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Hydrogen Sulfide Signaling in Neurodegenerative Movement Disorders.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2026Review
- Protein-mediated stabilization and nicking of the nontemplate DNA strand dramatically affect R-loop formation in vitro.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Targeting the DNA damage response in cancer.MedComm · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Loss of the ATM protein kinase in humans results in Ataxia-telangiectasia, a disorder characterized by childhood-onset neurodegeneration of the cerebellum as well as cancer predisposition and immunodeficiency. Although many aspects of ATM function are well-understood, the mechanistic basis of the progressive cerebellar ataxia that occurs in patients is not. Here we review recent progress related to the role of ATM in neurons and the cerebellum that comes from many sources: animal models, post-mortem brain tissue samples, and human neurons in culture. These observations have revealed new insights into the consequences of ATM loss on DNA damage, gene expression, and immune signaling in the brain. Many results point to the importance of reactive oxygen species as well as single-strand DNA breaks in the progression of molecular events leading to neuronal dysfunction. In addition, innate immunity signaling pathways appear to play a critical role in ATM functions in microglia, responding to various forms of nucleic acid sensors and regulating survival of neurons and other cell types. Overall, the results lead to an updated view of transcriptional stress and DNA damage resulting from ATM loss that results in changes in gene expression as well as neuroinflammation that contribute to the cerebellar neurodegeneration observed in patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.