Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38377622›Full record

ArticleIET systems biology2024

Anoikis-related genes as potential prognostic biomarkers in gastric cancer: A multilevel integrative analysis and predictive therapeutic value.

Yongjian Lin, Jinlu Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IET systems biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yongjian LinDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Gland Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.ORCID 0009-0006-8130-1586
Jinlu LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Gland Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric cancer (GC) is a frequent malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract. Exploring the potential anoikis mechanisms and pathways might facilitate GC research. PURPOSE: The authors aim to determine the significance of anoikis-related genes (ARGs) in GC prognosis and explore the regulatory mechanisms in epigenetics.

methodsAfter describing the genetic and transcriptional alterations of ARGs, we searched differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from the cancer genome atlas and gene expression omnibus databases to identify major cancer marker pathways. The non-negative matrix factorisation algorithm, Lasso, and Cox regression analysis were used to construct a risk model, and we validated and assessed the nomogram. Based on multiple levels and online platforms, this research evaluated the regulatory relationship of ARGs with GC.

resultsOverexpression of ARGs is associated with poor prognosis, which modulates immune signalling and promotes anti-anoikis. The consistency of the DEGs clustering with weighted gene co-expression network analysis results and the nomogram containing 10 variable genes improved the clinical applicability of ARGs. In anti-anoikis mode, cytology, histology, and epigenetics could facilitate the analysis of immunophenotypes, tumour immune microenvironment (TIME), and treatment prognosis.

conclusionA novel anoikis-related prognostic model for GC is constructed, and the significance of anoikis-related prognostic genes in the TIME and the metabolic pathways of tumours is initially explored.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsAlgorithmsAnoikisBiomarkersHumansPrognosisTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkerscancergeneticspatient treatment

Identifiers

PMID38377622
PMCPMC10996445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.