Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38377393›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

Fast and scalable querying of eukaryotic linear motifs with gget elm.

Laura Luebbert, Chi Hoang, Manjeet Kumar, Lior Pachter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura LuebbertDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1379-2927
Chi HoangCalifornia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States.
Manjeet KumarStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Lior PachterDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9164-6231

Funding

California Institute of Technology and the Chen Graduate Innovator CHEN.SYS3.CGIAFY21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationEukaryotic linear motifs (ELMs), or Short Linear Motifs, are protein interaction modules that play an essential role in cellular processes and signaling networks and are often involved in diseases like cancer. The ELM database is a collection of manually curated motif knowledge from scientific papers. It has become a crucial resource for investigating motif biology and recognizing candidate ELMs in novel amino acid sequences. Users can search amino acid sequences or UniProt Accessions on the ELM resource web interface. However, as with many web services, there are limitations in the swift processing of large-scale queries through the ELM web interface or API calls, and, therefore, integration into protein function analysis pipelines is limited.

resultsTo allow swift, large-scale motif analyses on protein sequences using ELMs curated in the ELM database, we have extended the gget suite of Python and command line tools with a new module, gget elm, which does not rely on the ELM server for efficiently finding candidate ELMs in user-submitted amino acid sequences and UniProt Accessions. gget elm increases accessibility to the information stored in the ELM database and allows scalable searches for motif-mediated interaction sites in the amino acid sequences. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The manual and source code are available at https://github.com/pachterlab/gget.

Indexed as

ProteinsSoftwareAmino Acid MotifsAmino Acid SequenceDatabases, ProteinProteins

Identifiers

PMID38377393
PMCPMC10927331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.