Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38377349›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2024

Investigating the Evolution of Drosophila STING-Dependent Antiviral Innate Immunity by Multispecies Comparison of 2'3'-cGAMP Responses.

Léna Hédelin, Antonin Thiébaut, Jingxian Huang, Xiaoyan Li, Aurélie Lemoine, Gabrielle Haas, Carine Meignin, Hua Cai, Robert M Waterhouse, Nelson Martins and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Evolutionary immunology to explore original antiviral strategies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Léna HédelinCNRS UPR9022, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Antonin ThiébautDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jingxian HuangSchool of Basic Medical Science, Sino-French Hoffmann Institute, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoyan LiSchool of Basic Medical Science, Sino-French Hoffmann Institute, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Aurélie LemoineCNRS UPR9022, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Gabrielle HaasCNRS UPR9022, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Carine MeigninCNRS UPR9022, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Hua CaiSchool of Basic Medical Science, Sino-French Hoffmann Institute, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Robert M WaterhouseDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nelson MartinsCNRS UPR9022, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Jean-Luc ImlerCNRS UPR9022, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRGuangzhou Medical University · CNInstitut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire · FRSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 186397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viruses represent a major threat to all animals, which defend themselves through induction of a large set of virus-stimulated genes that collectively control the infection. In vertebrates, these genes include interferons that play a critical role in the amplification of the response to infection. Virus- and interferon-stimulated genes include restriction factors targeting the different steps of the viral replication cycle, in addition to molecules associated with inflammation and adaptive immunity. Predictably, antiviral genes evolve dynamically in response to viral pressure. As a result, each animal has a unique arsenal of antiviral genes. Here, we exploit the capacity to experimentally activate the evolutionarily conserved stimulator of IFN genes (STING) signaling pathway by injection of the cyclic dinucleotide 2'3'-cyclic guanosine monophosphate-adenosine monophosphate into flies to define the repertoire of STING-regulated genes in 10 Drosophila species, spanning 40 million years of evolution. Our data reveal a set of conserved STING-regulated factors, including STING itself, a cGAS-like-receptor, the restriction factor pastel, and the antiviral protein Vago, but also 2 key components of the antiviral RNA interference pathway, Dicer-2, and Argonaute2. In addition, we identify unknown species- or lineage-specific genes that have not been previously associated with resistance to viruses. Our data provide insight into the core antiviral response in Drosophila flies and pave the way for the characterization of previously unknown antiviral effectors.

Indexed as

DrosophilaImmunity, InnateAnimalsNucleotides, Cycliccyclic guanosine monophosphate-adenosine monophosphateNucleotides, Cyclic2'3'-cGAMPcGAS/STINGDrosophilaevo-immunotranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID38377349
PMCPMC10917227
OpenAlexW4391952185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.