Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38377150›Full record

ReviewPLoS medicine2024

Estimating the impact of alternative programmatic cotrimoxazole strategies on mortality among children born to mothers with HIV: A modelling study.

Shrey Mathur, Melanie Smuk, Ceri Evans, Catherine J Wedderburn, Diana M Gibb, Martina Penazzato, Andrew J Prendergast

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Shrey MathurBlizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2809-8244
Melanie SmukBlizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1594-1458
Ceri EvansBlizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9122-9748
Catherine J WedderburnMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4887-1644
Diana M GibbMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9738-5490
Martina PenazzatoDepartment of Research for Health, Science Division, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5485-8692
Andrew J PrendergastBlizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7904-7992
Queen Mary University of London · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Liverpool · GBWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U122886353Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/17Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/26Wellcome TrustWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorld Health Organization (WHO) guidelines recommend cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for children who are HIV-exposed until infection is excluded and vertical transmission risk has ended. While cotrimoxazole has benefits for children with HIV, there is no mortality benefit for children who are HIV-exposed but uninfected, prompting a review of global guidelines. Here, we model the potential impact of alternative cotrimoxazole strategies on mortality in children who are HIV-exposed. METHODS AND

findingsUsing a deterministic compartmental model, we estimated mortality in children who are HIV-exposed from 6 weeks to 2 years of age in 4 high-burden countries: Côte d'Ivoire, Mozambique, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. Vertical transmission rates, testing rates, and antiretroviral therapy (ART) uptake were derived from UNAIDS data, trial evidence, and meta-analyses. We explored 6 programmatic strategies: maintaining current recommendations; shorter cotrimoxazole provision for 3, 6, 9, or 12 months; and starting cotrimoxazole only for children diagnosed with HIV. Modelled alternatives to the current strategy increased mortality to varying degrees; countries with high vertical transmission had the greatest mortality. Compared to current recommendations, starting cotrimoxazole only after a positive HIV test had the greatest predicted increase in mortality: Mozambique (961 excess annual deaths; excess mortality 339 per 100,000 HIV-exposed children; risk ratio (RR) 1.06), Uganda (491; 221; RR 1.04), Zimbabwe (352; 260; RR 1.05), and Côte d'Ivoire (125; 322; RR 1.06). Similar effects were observed for 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month strategies. Increased mortality persisted but was attenuated when modelling lower cotrimoxazole uptake, smaller mortality benefits, higher testing coverage, and lower vertical transmission rates. The study is limited by uncertain estimates of cotrimoxazole coverage in programmatic settings; an inability to model increases in mortality arising from antimicrobial resistance due to limited surveillance data in sub-Saharan Africa; and lack of a formal health economic analysis.

conclusionsChanging current guidelines from universal cotrimoxazole provision for children who are HIV-exposed increased predicted mortality across the 4 modelled high-burden countries, depending on test-to-treat cascade coverage and vertical transmission rates. These findings can help inform policymaker deliberations on cotrimoxazole strategies, recognising that the risks and benefits differ across settings.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug CombinationChildFemaleHumansMothersMozambiqueZimbabweTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination

Identifiers

PMID38377150
PMCPMC10914273
OpenAlexW4391952922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.