Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38377138›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

High-volume, label-free imaging for quantifying single-cell dynamics in induced pluripotent stem cell colonies.

Anthony J Asmar, Zackery A Benson, Adele P Peskin, Joe Chalfoun, Mylene Simon, Michael Halter, Anne L Plant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anthony J AsmarBiosystems and Biomaterials Division Material Measurement Lab, NIST Gaithersburg, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4843-0785
Zackery A BensonBiosystems and Biomaterials Division Material Measurement Lab, NIST Gaithersburg, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.
Adele P PeskinSoftware and Systems Division Information Technology Lab, NIST Gaithersburg, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.
Joe ChalfounSoftware and Systems Division Information Technology Lab, NIST Gaithersburg, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.
Mylene SimonSoftware and Systems Division Information Technology Lab, NIST Gaithersburg, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.
Michael HalterBiosystems and Biomaterials Division Material Measurement Lab, NIST Gaithersburg, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.
Anne L PlantBiosystems and Biomaterials Division Material Measurement Lab, NIST Gaithersburg, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To facilitate the characterization of unlabeled induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) during culture and expansion, we developed an AI pipeline for nuclear segmentation and mitosis detection from phase contrast images of individual cells within iPSC colonies. The analysis uses a 2D convolutional neural network (U-Net) plus a 3D U-Net applied on time lapse images to detect and segment nuclei, mitotic events, and daughter nuclei to enable tracking of large numbers of individual cells over long times in culture. The analysis uses fluorescence data to train models for segmenting nuclei in phase contrast images. The use of classical image processing routines to segment fluorescent nuclei precludes the need for manual annotation. We optimize and evaluate the accuracy of automated annotation to assure the reliability of the training. The model is generalizable in that it performs well on different datasets with an average F1 score of 0.94, on cells at different densities, and on cells from different pluripotent cell lines. The method allows us to assess, in a non-invasive manner, rates of mitosis and cell division which serve as indicators of cell state and cell health. We assess these parameters in up to hundreds of thousands of cells in culture for more than 36 hours, at different locations in the colonies, and as a function of excitation light exposure.

Indexed as

Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsCell LineDiagnostic ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID38377138
PMCPMC10878516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.