Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38377105›Full record

Observational studyPLoS neglected tropical diseases2024

Identification of tungiasis infection hotspots with a low-cost, high-throughput method for extracting Tunga penetrans (Siphonaptera) off-host stages from soil samples-An observational study.

Abneel K Matharu, Paul Ouma, Margaret M Njoroge, Billy L Amugune, Ayako Hyuga, Francis Mutebi, Jürgen Krücken, Hermann Feldmeier, Lynne Elson, Ulrike Fillinger

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Abneel K MatharuFreie Universität Berlin, Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0045-5588
Paul OumaInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Human Health Theme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Margaret M NjorogeInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Human Health Theme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Billy L AmuguneInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Human Health Theme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ayako HyugaInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Human Health Theme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Francis MutebiMakerere University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Kampala, Uganda.
Jürgen KrückenFreie Universität Berlin, Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Hermann FeldmeierCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Berlin, Germany.
Lynne ElsonKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Centre for Geographic Medicine Research (Coast), Kilifi, Kenya.
Ulrike FillingerInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Human Health Theme, Nairobi, Kenya.
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology · KEBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DEKenya Medical Research Institute · KEMakerere University · UG

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe sand flea, Tunga penetrans, is the cause of a severely neglected parasitic skin disease (tungiasis) in the tropics and has received little attention from entomologists to understand its transmission ecology. Like all fleas, T. penetrans has environmental off-host stages presenting a constant source of reinfection. We adapted the Berlese-Tullgren funnel method using heat from light bulbs to extract off-host stages from soil samples to identify the major development sites within rural households in Kenya and Uganda. METHODS AND

findingsSimple, low-cost units of multiple funnels were designed to allow the extraction of >60 soil samples in parallel. We calibrated the method by investigating the impact of different bulb wattage and extraction time on resulting abundance and quality of off-host stages. A cross-sectional field survey was conducted in 49 tungiasis affected households. A total of 238 soil samples from indoor and outdoor living spaces were collected and extracted. Associations between environmental factors, household member infection status and the presence and abundance of off-host stages in the soil samples were explored using generalized models. The impact of heat (bulb wattage) and time (hours) on the efficiency of extraction was demonstrated and, through a stepwise approach, standard operating conditions defined that consistently resulted in the recovery of 75% (95% CI 63-85%) of all present off-host stages from any given soil sample. To extract off-host stages alive, potentially for consecutive laboratory bioassays, a low wattage (15-25 W) and short extraction time (4 h) will be required. The odds of finding off-host stages in indoor samples were 3.7-fold higher than in outdoor samples (95% CI 1.8-7.7). For every one larva outdoors, four (95% CI 1.3-12.7) larvae were found indoors. We collected 67% of all off-host specimen from indoor sleeping locations and the presence of off-host stages in these locations was strongly associated with an infected person sleeping in the room (OR 10.5 95% CI 3.6-28.4).

conclusionThe indoor sleeping areas are the transmission hotspots for tungiasis in rural homes in Kenya and Uganda and can be targeted for disease control and prevention measures. The soil extraction methods can be used as a simple tool for monitoring direct impact of such interventions.

Indexed as

Flea InfestationsSkin Diseases, ParasiticTungiasisAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLarvaTunga

Identifiers

PMID38377105
PMCPMC10906885
OpenAlexW4391984743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.