ArticlePLoS computational biology2024
Inference of annealed protein fitness landscapes with AnnealDCA.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Direct coupling analysis and the attention mechanism.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- FLIGHTED: Inferring Fitness Landscapes from Noisy High-Throughput Experimental Data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The design of proteins with specific tasks is a major challenge in molecular biology with important diagnostic and therapeutic applications. High-throughput screening methods have been developed to systematically evaluate protein activity, but only a small fraction of possible protein variants can be tested using these techniques. Computational models that explore the sequence space in-silico to identify the fittest molecules for a given function are needed to overcome this limitation. In this article, we propose AnnealDCA, a machine-learning framework to learn the protein fitness landscape from sequencing data derived from a broad range of experiments that use selection and sequencing to quantify protein activity. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method by applying it to antibody Rep-Seq data of immunized mice and screening experiments, assessing the quality of the fitness landscape reconstructions. Our method can be applied to several experimental cases where a population of protein variants undergoes various rounds of selection and sequencing, without relying on the computation of variants enrichment ratios, and thus can be used even in cases of disjoint sequence samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.