ArticleJMIR medical education2024
AI Education for Fourth-Year Medical Students: Two-Year Experience of a Web-Based, Self-Guided Curriculum and Mixed Methods Study.
Article in JMIR medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the effectiveness of artificial intelligence education and training for healthcare workers: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Assessing digital health curriculum needs: a mixed-methods study of student and faculty perspectives in a Singapore medical school.Medical education online · 2026Article
- Role-Differentiated AI Competencies and Curriculum Implications for Health Professions Education: Qualitative Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Medical students' knowledge and attitude towards using artificial intelligence in medical education and practice: a pre-post study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- A Competency Framework for Medical AI Education: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Medical students' and faculty members' perceptions and experiences of AI integration in health care practice and in medical curricula: A meta-ethnographic review.Medical education · 2026Review
- Public Perceptions of AI in Medicine and Implications for Future Medical Education: Cross-Sectional Survey.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Health Professions Education: Qualitative Study of Student Experiences.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Article
- Framework for AI integration into the undergraduate medical curricula: a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Clinical Informatics Education to Advance Learning Health Systems: A Scoping Review.Learning health systems · 2026Article
- Implementation of a Novel Case-Based Session for Medical Students Focused on Artificial Intelligence Ethics.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2026Article
- Current Landscape of Curriculum Development and Implementation in Medical Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Twelve tips for developing and implementing AI curriculum for undergraduate medical education.Medical education online · 2025Review
- AI-powered platform revolutionizing blood cell morphology education for medical students.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Refining AI perspectives: assessing the impact of ai curricular on medical students' attitudes towards artificial intelligence.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Review
- Liability of Health Professionals Using Sensors, Telemedicine and Artificial Intelligence for Remote Healthcare.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Optimization of diagnosis and treatment of hematological diseases via artificial intelligence.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- AI's pivotal impact on redefining stakeholder roles and their interactions in medical education and health care.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are poised to have a substantial impact in the health care space. While a plethora of web-based resources exist to teach programming skills and ML model development, there are few introductory curricula specifically tailored to medical students without a background in data science or programming. Programs that do exist are often restricted to a specific specialty.
objectiveWe hypothesized that a 1-month elective for fourth-year medical students, composed of high-quality existing web-based resources and a project-based structure, would empower students to learn about the impact of AI and ML in their chosen specialty and begin contributing to innovation in their field of interest. This study aims to evaluate the success of this elective in improving self-reported confidence scores in AI and ML. The authors also share our curriculum with other educators who may be interested in its adoption.
methodsThis elective was offered in 2 tracks: technical (for students who were already competent programmers) and nontechnical (with no technical prerequisites, focusing on building a conceptual understanding of AI and ML). Students established a conceptual foundation of knowledge using curated web-based resources and relevant research papers, and were then tasked with completing 3 projects in their chosen specialty: a data set analysis, a literature review, and an AI project proposal. The project-based nature of the elective was designed to be self-guided and flexible to each student's interest area and career goals. Students' success was measured by self-reported confidence in AI and ML skills in pre and postsurveys. Qualitative feedback on students' experiences was also collected.
resultsThis web-based, self-directed elective was offered on a pass-or-fail basis each month to fourth-year students at Emory University School of Medicine beginning in May 2021. As of June 2022, a total of 19 students had successfully completed the elective, representing a wide range of chosen specialties: diagnostic radiology (n=3), general surgery (n=1), internal medicine (n=5), neurology (n=2), obstetrics and gynecology (n=1), ophthalmology (n=1), orthopedic surgery (n=1), otolaryngology (n=2), pathology (n=2), and pediatrics (n=1). Students' self-reported confidence scores for AI and ML rose by 66% after this 1-month elective. In qualitative surveys, students overwhelmingly reported enthusiasm and satisfaction with the course and commented that the self-direction and flexibility and the project-based design of the course were essential.
conclusionsCourse participants were successful in diving deep into applications of AI in their widely-ranging specialties, produced substantial project deliverables, and generally reported satisfaction with their elective experience. The authors are hopeful that a brief, 1-month investment in AI and ML education during medical school will empower this next generation of physicians to pave the way for AI and ML innovation in health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.