ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Disparities in Eye Care Utilization Among Refugee and Migrant Populations.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinic-based burden of glaucoma among Sahrawi refugees in the Tindouf camps.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Sensory Difficulty and Assistive Device Use Among Older U.S. Immigrants: Differences by Region of Origin.Research on aging · 2026Article
- The effects of a 13-year war on the reality of ophthalmology services and education in Syria.AJO international · 2025Article
- Exploring Barriers To Visual Screening for Canadian Immigrants in a General Primary Care Clinic: A Retrospective Chart Review.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2025Article
- Social Determinants of Health and Barriers in Accessing Eye Care for Refugees in the Greater Toronto Area.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: In this cross-sectional study, we examined refugee/migrant participants' health and eye care utilization compared to controls in San Diego County. Methods: Data were collected from electronic health records (EHRs) at UCSD Health-affiliated medical centers. Through a manual review of EHRs, eligibility criteria to identify a cohort were developed. A total of 64 refugee/migrant participants and 95 control participants matched based on country of origin, age, and sex were included in the analysis. Demographic characteristics, insurance type, and vision/eye care utilization were compared between the two groups. Results: A greater proportion of refugee/migrant participants were more likely to be enrolled in government-sponsored insurance programs, predominantly Medicaid when compared to controls (55% vs. 24%, P = < 0.01). When adjusting for age, history of ophthalmic procedure, and surgery, refugee status was associated with fewer encounters with ophthalmologists in a multivariable linear regression model (coefficient = -1.66 [95% confidence interval [CI] = -2.89 to -0.44], P = 0.009). Conclusions: This study highlights disparities in eye care utilization for refugee/migrant populations. When compared to controls, a larger proportion of refugees/migrants had government-funded insurance, and refugee status was associated with fewer encounters with ophthalmologists. These findings underscore the need for further research on this population to better understand potential healthcare barriers these individuals may encounter. Translational Relevance: This analysis of EHR data illustrates disparities in eye care experienced by refugees/migrants, highlighting potential gaps in care in a vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.