Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38376816›Full record

ReviewGenetics2024

PomBase: a Global Core Biodata Resource-growth, collaboration, and sustainability.

Kim M Rutherford, Manuel Lera-Ramírez, Valerie Wood

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Meiotic cohesin Rec8 imposes fitness costs on fission yeast gametes favoring the evolution of parental bias in gene expression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Production of flavonoidPlant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kim M RutherfordDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6277-726X
Manuel Lera-RamírezDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8666-9746
Valerie WoodDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6330-7526

Funding

Gene Ontology Consortium and KnowledgebaseU24HG012212 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHRISTOPHER J MUNGALL, PAUL Warren STERNBERG · 2022 to 2026
$11.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG012212Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 218236/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PomBase (https://www.pombase.org), the model organism database (MOD) for fission yeast, was recently awarded Global Core Biodata Resource (GCBR) status by the Global Biodata Coalition (GBC; https://globalbiodata.org/) after a rigorous selection process. In this MOD review, we present PomBase's continuing growth and improvement over the last 2 years. We describe these improvements in the context of the qualitative GCBR indicators related to scientific quality, comprehensivity, accelerating science, user stories, and collaborations with other biodata resources. This review also showcases the depth of existing connections both within the biocuration ecosystem and between PomBase and its user community.

Indexed as

SchizosaccharomycesDatabases, GeneticGenome, FungalbiocurationdatabaseFAIRfission yeastGlobal BioData CoalitionGlobal Core Biodata ResourceknowledgebaseMODmodel organismmodel organism databaseSchizosaccharomyces pombestandardization

Identifiers

PMID38376816
PMCPMC11075564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.