Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38376732›Full record

Observational studyJournal of endocrinological investigation2024

Communication of the diagnosis to Klinefelter subjects: an observational study on a key moment of the patient's life.

A Garolla, M Kiesswetter, S Angelini, F Cavalieri, C Foresta, M Panzeri, A Ferlin

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Update on Physical, Psychological, and Quality of Life Management in Klinefelter Syndrome.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A GarollaAndrology and Reproductive Medicine & Centre for Klinefelter Syndrome, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4736-9051
M KiesswetterInstitute of Psychology, UMIT TIROL, University of Health Sciences and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1907-7123
S AngeliniAndrology and Reproductive Medicine & Centre for Klinefelter Syndrome, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
F CavalieriAndrology and Reproductive Medicine & Centre for Klinefelter Syndrome, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
C ForestaAndrology and Reproductive Medicine & Centre for Klinefelter Syndrome, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6576-2183
M PanzeriDepartment of Developmental Psychology and Socialisation, Padua University, Padua, Italy. marta.panzeri@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6219-4408
A FerlinAndrology and Reproductive Medicine & Centre for Klinefelter Syndrome, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5817-8141

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeKlinefelter syndrome (KS) is the most prevalent sex chromosome disorder among males. The communication of the KS diagnosis holds significant implications for the diagnosis's acceptance. Recently, the increased use of prenatal diagnostic procedures has raised the question of whether, when, and by whom information, once provided to parents, should be communicated to their children/adolescents. Currently, there is limited information on this topic. This study aims to investigate the most suitable timing, content, and healthcare professionals (HCPs) according to KS patients' suggestions for conveying the diagnosis, analyzing the impact of communicating the KS diagnosis on patients and their reception of the communication in real-life situations. Furthermore, research entails a comparison of the actual communication and the patients' preferred mode of communication.

methodsSelf-reported interview data was collected from 196 adults diagnosed with KS. The interview was structured, consisting of 32 multiple-choice questions covering various areas related to diagnosis communication.

resultsMost patients with Klinefelter syndrome reported that earlier communication would have been beneficial. Communication before the age of 18 and by parents increased the likelihood of overcoming negative consequences and relying on psychological support.

conclusionTo mitigate the adverse effects of poorly timed and inadequately delivered communication, typically by a single person, it is advisable that such communication be carried out at the onset of adolescence by an interdisciplinary team of HCPs (including psychologists, geneticists, endocrinologists) and parents. The information provided should not solely concentrate on hormonal and fertility aspects, but also consider other factors such as psychological variables.

Indexed as

CommunicationKlinefelter SyndromeAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParentsPhysician-Patient RelationsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAcceptance of the diagnosisCommunication of the diagnosisKlinefelter syndromeSexual healthTime of diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID38376732
PMCPMC11266383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.