Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38376627›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2024

Current Trends and Challenges of Microbiome Research in Bladder Cancer.

Ilaha Isali, Emma K Helstrom, Nicole Uzzo, Ankita Lakshmanan, Devika Nandwana, Henkel Valentine, Mohit Sindhani, Philip Abbosh, Laura Bukavina

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ilaha IsaliDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Emma K HelstromDepartment of Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nicole UzzoDepartment of Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ankita LakshmananDepartment of Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Devika NandwanaDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Henkel ValentineDepartment of Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mohit SindhaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Philip AbboshDepartment of Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Laura BukavinaDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA. Laura.Bukavina2@uhhospitals.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reviewMicrobiome research has provided valuable insights into the associations between microbial communities and bladder cancer. However, this field faces significant challenges that hinder the interpretation, generalization, and translation of findings into clinical practice. This review aims to elucidate these challenges and highlight the importance of addressing them for the advancement of microbiome research in bladder cancer. RECENT

findingsRecent findings underscore the complexities involved in microbiome research, particularly in the context of bladder cancer. Challenges include low microbial biomass in urine samples, potential contamination issues during collection and processing, variability in sequencing methods and primer selection, and the difficulty of establishing causality between microbiota and bladder cancer. Studies have shown the impact of sample storage conditions and DNA isolation kits on microbiome analysis, emphasizing the need for standardization. Additionally, variations in urine collection methods can introduce contamination and affect results. The choice of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing or shotgun metagenomic sequencing introduces technical challenges, including primer selection and sequencing read length. Establishing causality between the microbiota and bladder cancer requires experimental methods like fecal microbiota transplantation and human microbiota-associated murine models, which face their own set of challenges. Translating microbiome research into therapeutic applications is hindered by methodological variability, incomplete understanding of bioactive molecules, imperfect animal models, and the inherent heterogeneity of microbiome communities among individuals. Microbiome research in bladder cancer presents significant challenges stemming from technical and conceptual complexities. Addressing these challenges through standardization, improved experimental models, and advanced analytical approaches is essential for advancing our understanding of the microbiome's role in bladder cancer and its potential clinical applications. Achieving this goal can lead to improved patient outcomes and novel therapeutic strategies in the future.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAnimalsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMiceRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16SBladder cancerGut microbiomeMicrobiomeUrine microbiomeUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID38376627
PMCPMC10920447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.