Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38376591›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Seawater nasal wash to reduce symptom duration and viral load in COVID-19 and upper respiratory tract infections: a randomized controlled multicenter trial.

Ludovic de Gabory, Sophie Vallet, Gaëlle Naelten, Chantal Raherison-Semjen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04916639 (Seawater Nasal Wash to Relieve COVID-19 Nasal Symptoms and Reduce SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load.), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04916639 nacompletednot on this map

Seawater Nasal Wash to Relieve COVID-19 Nasal Symptoms and Reduce SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load.

TypeinterventionalSponsorLaboratoire de la MerRan2021 to 2022Enrolled370ConditionsSARS-CoV2 Infection (COVID-19), URTI - Viral Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionArmsDevice: Physiomer undiluted seawater nasal spray
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Electrolyte-rich saline solutions significantly improve nasal epithelial repair, ciliary beating and epithelial inflammation vs. normal saline.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ludovic de GaboryDepartment of Otolaryngology (ENT) and Head & Neck Surgery, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France. ludovic.de-gabory@chu-bordeaux.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0113-6121
Sophie ValletVirology Unit, Brest University Hospital Centre, Brest, France.
Gaëlle NaeltenLaboratoire de La Mer, Saint Malo, France.
Chantal Raherison-SemjenDepartment of Pneumology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Guadeloupe, Guadeloupe, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective was to assess the efficacy of seawater nasal wash on symptom duration, intranasal viral load, household transmission in COVID-19 and URTIs.

methodsThis prospective, randomized, controlled, multicentric, parallel study included 355 mild/moderate COVID-19 and URTI adults with rhinologic symptoms ≤ 48h. Active group performed 4-daily nasal washes with undiluted isotonic seawater versus control group (without nasal wash). Symptoms were self-assessed daily using the WURSS-21 questionnaire for 3 weeks. Viral load was measured by RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swabs collected on Day 0, Day 5, Day 14 and Day 21. Digital droplet PCR was additionally performed for SARS-CoV-2.

resultsOverall COVID-19 subjects recovered earlier the ability to accomplish daily activities in the active group (- 1.6 day, p = 0.0487) with earlier improvement of taste (- 2 days, p = 0.0404). COVID-19 subjects with severe nasal symptoms at D0 showed the earliest resolution of anosmia (- 5.2 days, p = 0.0281), post-nasal drip (- 4.1 days, p = 0.0102), face pain/heaviness (- 4.5 days, p = 0.0078), headache (- 3.1 days, p = 0.0195), sore throat (- 3.3 days, p = 0.0319), dyspnea (- 3.1 days, p = 0.0195), chest congestion (- 2.8 days, p = 0.0386) and loss of appetite (- 4.5 days, p = 0.0186) with nasal wash. In URTIs subjects, an earlier resolution of rhinorrhea (- 3.5 days, p = 0.0370), post-nasal drip (- 3.7 days, p = 0.0378), and overall sickness (- 4.3 days, p = 0.0248) was reported with nasal wash. Evolution towards more severe COVID-19 was lower in active vs control, with earlier viral load reduction in youngest subjects (≥ 1.5log10 copies/10000 cells at Day 5: 88.9% vs 62.5%, p = 0.0456). In the active group, a lower percentage of SARS-CoV-2 positive household contacts (0-10.7%) was reported vs controls (3.2-16.1%) among subjects with Delta variant (p = 0.0413).

conclusionThis trial showed the efficacy and safety of seawater nasal wash in COVID-19 and URTIs.

trial registrationTrial registry ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04916639. Registration date: 04.06.2021.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2SeawaterViral LoadAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasal LavageProspective StudiesRespiratory Tract InfectionsCOVID-19IrrigationSARS-CoV-2 viral loadSeawaterUpper Respiratory Tract Infections

Identifiers

PMID38376591
PMCPMC11211132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.