Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38376549›Full record

Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2024

Comparison of Cross-Sectional Area of Pubovisceral Muscle in Nulliparous and Primiparous Women.

Alexandra Regendova, Adela Samesova, Katerina Zapletalova, Sabina Horejskova, Zuzana Svata, Monika Hrdouskova, Jan Zapletal, Ladislav Krofta, Lucie Hajkova Hympanova

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandra RegendovaCharles University, Third Faculty of Medicine, Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic.
Adela SamesovaCharles University, Third Faculty of Medicine, Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic.
Katerina ZapletalovaCharles University, Third Faculty of Medicine, Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic.
Sabina HorejskovaCharles University, Third Faculty of Medicine, Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic.
Zuzana SvataKlinika JL-MR, Prague, Czech Republic.
Monika HrdouskovaCharles University, Third Faculty of Medicine, Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan ZapletalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ladislav KroftaCharles University, Third Faculty of Medicine, Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lucie Hajkova HympanovaCharles University, Third Faculty of Medicine, Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic. lucie.hympanova@upmd.eu.
Charles University · CZÚstav pro Péči o Matku a Dítě · CZOcní klinika · CZ

Funding

Univerzita Karlova v Praze CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/19_073/0016935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe main risk factor for pelvic floor disorders is vaginal delivery, which may cause levator ani muscle (LAM) injury and denervation. LAM includes pubovisceral muscle (PVM, pubococcygeus), puborectalis muscle (PRM), and iliococcygeus muscle. We hypothesize that primiparous women with low pelvic floor muscle contraction have a reduced PVM cross-sectional area (CSA) compared to nulliparous women. METHODS (SAMPLE SIZE AND STATISTICAL APPROACHES): This single-centre prospective observational study compared healthy nulliparous (n = 40) to primiparous (n = 40) women after vaginal delivery without LAM avulsion and Oxford score ≤ 3. Demographics, questionnaires (ICIQ-UI-SF, OAB-Q-SF, PISQ-12), POP-Q, Oxford score, ultrasound measurements (minimal anteroposterior and lateral diameters, hiatal area, PRM thickness, levator-urethra gap) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-PVM CSA were evaluated. Normality was tested, and an appropriate test was used to compare the groups. Power calculation suggested 40 participants per group.

resultsThe primiparous group was older, had a higher BMI, and their hiatal area on ultrasound at contraction was larger compared to the nulliparous group. The CSA of the left-sided PVM (1.15 ± 0.50 cm

conclusionsPrimiparous women after vaginal delivery with low pelvic floor contraction force had reduced PVM CSA on MRI images compared to nulliparous women.

Indexed as

ParityPelvic FloorAdultDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMuscle ContractionPelvic Floor DisordersPregnancyProspective StudiesUltrasonographyCross-sectional areaDenervationMagnetic resonance imagingPubovisceral muscleUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID38376549
PMCPMC11052823
OpenAlexW4391957467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.