Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38376174›Full record

ReviewAsian journal of andrology2024

Current devices, outcomes, and pain management considerations in penile implant surgery: an updated review of the literature.

Nirupama Ancha, Maya Eldin, Tarah Woodle, Sofia Gereta, Krishna Hariprasad, Imani Butler, E Charles Osterberg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Asian journal of andrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nirupama AnchaDepartment of Surgery and Perioperative Care, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Maya EldinDepartment of Surgery and Perioperative Care, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Tarah WoodleDepartment of Urology, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX 78234, USA.
Sofia GeretaDepartment of Surgery and Perioperative Care, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Krishna HariprasadDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Imani ButlerDepartment of Surgery and Perioperative Care, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
E Charles OsterbergDepartment of Surgery and Perioperative Care, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX 78712, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile prosthesis surgery is a definitive treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED). The two categories of penile prosthesis are endorsed by professional guidelines, inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) and malleable penile prosthesis (MPP). Each modality of penile prosthesis offers distinct advantages and incorporates specific design features, allowing for personalized device selection that aligns with individual needs and preferences. While the overall complication rate of penile implant surgery remains low, surgeons should maintain a high index of suspicion for complications in the perioperative time period. Multimodal analgesic regimens including nerve blocks and narcotic-free pathways should be administered to manage perioperative pain. Finally, the high patient satisfaction after penile prosthesis surgery underscores the success of this ED treatment option.

Indexed as

Erectile DysfunctionPain ManagementPenile ImplantationPenile ProsthesisPostoperative PainHumansMalePatient SatisfactionProsthesis DesignTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38376174
PMCPMC11280207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.