Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38376097›Full record

ArticleOcular oncology and pathology2023

Dendritic Melanocytic Hyperplasia in Pterygia: A Potential Source of Diagnostic Confusion with Primary Acquired Melanosis.

Angela J Oh, Ben J Glasgow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ocular oncology and pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Malignant melanocytic lesions in clinically suspected pterygium.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Angela J OhDepartments of Ophthalmology, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ben J GlasgowDepartments of Ophthalmology, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to report the nearly ubiquitous prevalence of melanocytic hyperplasia in benign pterygia/pingueculae and establish that the entity is insufficiently recognized. Methods: This is a retrospective immunohistochemical pathology case series of 30 consecutive pterygia/pingueculae samples selected from an ophthalmic pathology database at a single institution. Histopathologic and immunohistochemistry analyses with anti-SOX-10 and anti-MART-1 antibodies were used for identifying melanocytes. The number of squamous cells intervening between melanocytes was determined. Results: The frequency of dendritic melanocytes was found to meet the criteria for dendritic melanocytic hyperplasia in 29 of 30 pterygia/pingueculae samples using specific antibodies. Melanocytes were found in several patterns: diffuse (28%), multifocal (28%), and focal (44%). In each case, the melanocytes were distributed as single melanocytes at the base; clusters of melanocytes were seen in 17% of samples. There were an average of about two intervening epithelial cells between melanocytes at the base. Conclusion: When diagnosed with immunohistochemistry, dendritic melanocytic hyperplasia is nearly ubiquitous in pterygia and pingueculae. Melanocytic hyperplasia may have a distribution that includes nests and single melanocytes above the basal layer, which can be confused with forms of primary acquired melanosis. It is important for pathologists to recognize these lesions as a distinct benign clinicopathologic entity.

Indexed as

ConjunctivaMelanocytic hyperplasiaPrimary acquired melanosis

Identifiers

PMID38376097
PMCPMC10821784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.