ArticleJournal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab2024
An LC-MS/MS-based platform for the quantification of multiple amyloid beta peptides in surrogate cerebrospinal fluid.
Article in Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of Novel Small-Molecule Targeting SCN1A-Associated Severe Myoclonic Epilepsy of Infancy.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Proteome-Based Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease: Old Acquisitions and Innovative Proposals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Synthesis and characterization of miniaturized aptamer-based monolithic sorbent for selective extraction of β-amyloid peptides from cerebrospinal fluid.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Mass spectrometry-based methods for biofluid biomarkers for progressive diseases: amyloid peptides and dystrophins.Bioanalysis · 2025Review
- Comparative evaluation of peptide vs. protein-based calibration for quantification of cardiac troponin I using ID-LC-MS/MS.Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine · 2025Article
- Neuroprotective Activities of Sertraline, Tiagabine, and Bicifadine with Autophagy-Inducing Potentials in a 6-Hydroxidopamine-Treated Parkinson's Disease Cell Model.Neurochemical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The accurate quantification of amyloid beta (Aβ) peptides in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is crucial for Alzheimer's disease (AD) research, particularly in terms of preclinical and biomarker studies. Traditional methods, such as the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), have limitations. These include high costs, labor intensity, lengthy processes, and the possibility of cross-reactivity. Objectives: The primary objectives of this research were twofold: to comprehensively characterize Aβ peptides and to develop a reliable and accurate method for the simultaneous quantification of Aβ 1-40 and Aβ 1-42 peptides in surrogate CSF that is traceable to the International System of Units (SI). Methods: We developed a novel method that combined solid phase extraction (SPE) with isotope dilution liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC/MSMS). SPE was employed to efficiently eliminate matrix interferences, while [15N] Aβ1-40 and [15N] Aβ1-42 served as internal standards to improve accuracy. In addition, we introduced Peptide Impurity Corrected Amino Acid Analysis (PICAA) to ensure traceability to the SI and reliable quantification of Aβ peptides. Results: The developed platform demonstrated a linear calibration range of 300-20000 pg/ml for both Aβ1-42 and Aβ1-40 peptides, accompanied by strong correlation coefficients greater than 0.995. Quality Control (QC) samples demonstrated an accuracy of at least 90.0 %. Conclusion: The enhanced specificity and flexibility of the developed platform potentially have implications for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and future investigations of novel Aβ peptide biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.