Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38375339›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Social determinants of health and health inequities in breast cancer screening: a scoping review.

Vama Jhumkhawala, Diana Lobaina, Goodness Okwaraji, Yasmine Zerrouki, Sara Burgoa, Adeife Marciniak, Sebastian Densley, Meera Rao, Daniella Diaz, Michelle Knecht and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Charting Your Course: A Roadmap to Select a Review Type for Your Research Journey.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Vama JhumkhawalaCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, United States.
Diana LobainaCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, United States.
Goodness OkwarajiCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, United States.
Yasmine ZerroukiCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, United States.
Sara BurgoaCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, United States.
Adeife MarciniakCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, United States.
Sebastian DensleyCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, United States.
Meera RaoCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, United States.
Daniella DiazCharles E. Schmidt College of Science, Boca Raton, FL, United States.
Michelle KnechtCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, United States.
Lea SaccaCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This scoping review aims to highlight key social determinants of health associated with breast cancer screening behavior in United States women aged ≥40  years old, identify public and private databases with SDOH data at city, state, and national levels, and share lessons learned from United States based observational studies in addressing SDOH in underserved women influencing breast cancer screening behaviors. Methods: The Arksey and O'Malley York methodology was used as guidance for this review: (1) identifying research questions; (2) searching for relevant studies; (3) selecting studies relevant to the research questions; (4) charting the data; and (5) collating, summarizing, and reporting results. Results: The 72 included studies were published between 2013 and 2023. Among the various SDOH identified, those related to socioeconomic status ( Discussion: Results may inform future evidence-based interventions aiming to address the underlying factors contributing to low screening rates for breast cancer in the United States.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMammographySocial Determinants of HealthAdultAgedFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedUnited Statesbreast cancer screeninghealth inequitiesmammographysocial determinants of healthunderserved womenUnited States

Identifiers

PMID38375339
PMCPMC10875738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.